If Mass <-> Energy was Feasible

[ZSNO]

Lol, when we split atoms, the mass still stays, it's just the energy holding the particles together gets released. Mass and energy are 2 separate things.
Fission in the splitting of atoms(releasing the energy in the particle bonds) and fusion is the combining of particles into atoms.
As said the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy say that matter and energy can not be destroyed or created, but rather changed, but not into each other.

Pay attention more in class, you may learn something.

[Ad Bot]

[Electrk]

Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy

OP has clearly never heard of this.

[Mold]

OP has clearly never heard of this.

And noone can say whether the law is true

[TristanLuigi]

let me break this down:
by "perfectly," are you implying that each transmittance would change the serial key on the note and reprint the ink perfectly?
and when was that published/how much of it have you read?
I'm guessing just wikipedia?

Just stop being so critical. And no, by "perfectly" I don't mean reprint the ink and make a new serial number. I'm saying duplicate* the atoms of a $100 bill or something, and while it would have the same serial number nobody really checks that now do they?

*imagine this is in 2212 AD.

Lol, when we split atoms, the mass still stays, it's just the energy holding the particles together gets released. Mass and energy are 2 separate things.
Fission in the splitting of atoms(releasing the energy in the particle bonds) and fusion is the combining of particles into atoms.
As said the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy say that matter and energy can not be destroyed or created, but rather changed, but not into each other.

Pay attention more in class, you may learn something.

We've been in school like 3 weeks. And it's Chemistry, not Physics. Second, I DO pay attention in Chemistry. We're still freaking going over what the difference is between mixtures and pure substances, and it's AIMS Chemistry 1 >.<

He's just throwing E=mc^2 around to try make himself look smart and to hide the fact that he doesn't know what the forget he's talking about.

Pretty much.
THIS THREAD WAS NOT MEANT TO BE "IS IT POSSIBLE" IT'S MEANT TO BE "IF IT WAS POSSIBLE"

[Jubel]

THIS THREAD WAS NOT MEANT TO BE "IS IT POSSIBLE" IT'S MEANT TO BE "IF IT WAS POSSIBLE"

if it was possible it would take so many buttloads of energy to do it you'd be lucky if you lost millions of dollars.

[Ipquarx]

If it was possible we would either have limitless clean energy or we would all be dead because the process forgeted up.

[Mold]

No, this is physics, not chemistry.

[ZSNO]

And noone can say whether the law is true

Just like everything else in science, it is never a fact, but they have evidence to back it up.
Why do I have to make this post.

[Mold]

Just like everything else in science, it is never a fact, but they have evidence to back it up.
Why do I have to make this post.

Because you don't

[TristanLuigi]

No, this is physics, not chemistry.

I know
I'm saying I haven't TAKEN Physics yet.

[Jairo]

what the op is trying to develop is that we split all of the atoms of an object at the speed of light to change it into energy
as in we change the placement and construction of atoms
which is basically what e=mc2 is actually about
the atomic bomb

what op wants is alchemy; transmittance
not this

[Ipquarx]

Just like everything else in science, it is never a fact, but they have evidence to back it up.
Why do I have to make this post.

Are you saying that everything known about science is likely wrong?
Haaha, then come up with your own theory of relativity and tell me how that goes.

the atomic bomb

Impossible to contain that much energy using a feasible amount of some substance.

[Electrk]

Pretty much.

...you are an idiot.

If you don't know what you're talking about, why start a thread about a topic that will obviously start a discussion? All this thread accomplished was make you look like a fool.

[TristanLuigi]

...you are an idiot.

If you don't know what you're talking about, why start a thread about a topic that will obviously start a discussion? All this thread accomplished was make you look like a fool.

As I said. It isn't about how possible it is, it's not about how much I know about the subject, and it's not about getting into a pointlesss argument about it that will not get either of us anywhere.

It's about how the world would fall apart if it did happen. Figuratively (economy) and literally (war).

[ZSNO]

Are you saying that everything known about science is likely wrong?
Haaha, then come up with your own theory of relativity and tell me how that goes.

You missed the point. I hope you were taught that really not that much in science is set in stone and can be changed to explain new observations.
Some things in science have so much evidence most people say it is fact, while technically it is not.
Just sayin'