[Bluzone Private Mods] Script_RPChat V4 | Script_TelChat V3

[Blockoverlord]

Filename is "Script_RPChat(1)" instead of "Script_RPChat"

pretty sure that happens when you download it more than once. Just rename it.

[Ad Bot]

[Lugnut]

technically doesn't even have to be renamed

[Lugnut]

Not really, you just prepend (and store) a random string to the password, which makes it harder to identify identical passwords (and makes brute-forcing it a bit slower, as well as making you need a bigger rainbow table to crack it).

for login, i would have to loop through all the salts and apply them to the input password to confirm they match, right?

my system isn't set up for that :/

[DontCare4Free]

for login, i would have to loop through all the salts and apply them to the input password to confirm they match, right?

my system isn't set up for that :/

You have one salt per password. There is no looping, you just store username+salt+sha(salt+password) instead of username+sha(password).

[Lugnut]

Code: [Select]

function registerRemoteUser(%name, %bl_id, %pass, %isadmin, %haseval) //register new user
{
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Name"] = %name;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Pass"] = %pass;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "BLID"] = %BL_ID;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "IsAdmin"] = %isadmin;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Eval"] = %haseval;
export("$ValidUserNameList*", "config/tcpUsers.cs");
}
becomes

Code: [Select]

function randstr(%len, %chr) //credit to ipquarx for giving me this months ago
{
if(!strLen(%chr))
{
%chr = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890";
}
%str = "";
%cln = strLen(%chr);
if(!strLen(%len) || %len < 1)
{
return %str;
}
for(%i = 0 ; %i < %len ; %i++)
{
%str = %str @ getSubStr(%chr, getRandom(0, %cln - 1), 1);
}
return %str;
}

function getSha1Password(%i)
{
%salt = randStr(getRandom(5, 10)); //might make these 10, 15. what's the harm :/
%hashed = sha1(%salt @ %password) TAB %salt;
}

function registerRemoteUser(%name, %bl_id, %pass, %isadmin, %haseval) //register new user
{
%hashed = getSha1Password(%pass);
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Name"] = %name;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Pass"] = getField(%hashed, 0);
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "BLID"] = %BL_ID;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "IsAdmin"] = %isadmin;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Eval"] = %haseval;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "salt"] = getField(%hashed, 1);
export("$ValidUserNameList*", "config/tcpUsers.cs");
}???

[Lugnut]

Telchat is released into what is essentially a public, untested beta.

it runs on $Pref::Server::Port + 25. If your server runs on 28000, it will run on 28025.

Will someone competent check to see if it's possibly to run it ON 28000? Kalphiter claims it is.

[DontCare4Free]

Code: [Select]

function registerRemoteUser(%name, %bl_id, %pass, %isadmin, %haseval) //register new user
{
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Name"] = %name;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Pass"] = %pass;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "BLID"] = %BL_ID;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "IsAdmin"] = %isadmin;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Eval"] = %haseval;
export("$ValidUserNameList*", "config/tcpUsers.cs");
}
becomes

Code: [Select]

function randstr(%len, %chr) //credit to ipquarx for giving me this months ago
{
if(!strLen(%chr))
{
%chr = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890";
}
%str = "";
%cln = strLen(%chr);
if(!strLen(%len) || %len < 1)
{
return %str;
}
for(%i = 0 ; %i < %len ; %i++)
{
%str = %str @ getSubStr(%chr, getRandom(0, %cln - 1), 1);
}
return %str;
}

function getSha1Password(%i)
{
%salt = randStr(getRandom(5, 10)); //might make these 10, 15. what's the harm :/
%hashed = sha1(%salt @ %password) TAB %salt;
}

function registerRemoteUser(%name, %bl_id, %pass, %isadmin, %haseval) //register new user
{
%hashed = getSha1Password(%pass);
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Name"] = %name;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Pass"] = getField(%hashed, 0);
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "BLID"] = %BL_ID;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "IsAdmin"] = %isadmin;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "Eval"] = %haseval;
$ValidUserNameList[%bl_id, "salt"] = getField(%hashed, 1);
export("$ValidUserNameList*", "config/tcpUsers.cs");
}???

About right, but having the salt being a random string is pretty pointless; longer is always better.

[Lugnut]

made it 20 - 25 long...
very nice.

[Arekan]

Can you make it so the RPChat doesn't always require last names?

[Lugnut]

Can you make it so the RPChat doesn't always require last names?

yes but why

[Arekan]

It tends to get annoying, my roleplays dont always use last names but this script is very useful :L

[Lugnut]

ok finedone
it's a rtb pref

[Arekan]

lol, thanks

[Swat 3]

Hm.

Lugnut, you thar.

Help me with this TelChat so i can hook it up to my Dedi.

[Lugnut]

right

0 info