Which do you prefer: Marco or Duplicator?

[Treynolds416]

on Kqgqn's server i remember it doing that

I don't think you know what I'm talking about

Edit: Even if it could do this, it would still count as a macro and therefore I would still say I use both

[Ad Bot]

[Scars75]

It depends. I use macros to make things like brick walls and several small props such as chairs, which the duplicator can't do efficiently because it has a flood limit. The duplicator is for copying larger things like houses or rooms.

[?]

i use buildwall(); and the other vanilla macros

[Ipquarx]

polo

Okay but in all seriousness add duploracator to the poll, it's so much better than the duplicator.

[Mysteroo]

I just use macro for the servers that don't have the duplicator. But it works fine for me, I don't have any problems with it

[Clix]

Well now its called the "duplorcator"

[Doomonkey]

For brick walls you use both. The macro to make a stack of bricks. The duplicator to select it. Then a macro again to plant them everywhere.

[Conan]

Macros are much more useful for repeating actions again and again, since for duplicator you will still have to end up moving the base brick over.

Usually I use both, by duplicating an object and using a macro to plant it multiple times.

[Racerboy]

polo

[Treynolds416]

Why is there still no 'both' option in the poll...

[Ben Grapevine]

uh can you please fix marco to macro?

[Headcrab Zombie]

Both have their uses

[Mr.Noßody]

Macros never worked for me.

I could record and stop, but replacing would make a mess.

[WALDO]

Duplicator has more functions than Marco. So it is a better tool.

[Blocky943]

I never figured out how to use Macros.
Duplorcator, definetly.