Author Topic: Why curing cancer is a bad idea  (Read 22565 times)

I love how people think the world is getting overpopulated when all of the world can fit into the USA with plenty of land to spare.
And there is more to the dang world than america.
Also, cancer is not in anyway natural. It is caused by mutations.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2012, 12:27:21 AM by Moppy »


Why kill it, we have an actual discussion rather than another generic above user game.

Troo, but we discussed da forget out of it earlier today.  Read through the thread dog.

I love how people think the world is getting overpopulated when all of the world can fit into the USA with plenty of land to spare.
And there is more to the dang world than america.
Also, cancer is not in anyway natural. It is caused by mutations.
Humans are small and the earth is very very big.
Space for habitation isn't a limiting factor on human population, atleast not on earth. You'd need unimaginable numbers of humans to run out of space.

The limiting factor for a large population on the earth is more to do with resources, but even at this moment of time, while we may worry that there aren't enough fossil fuels to provide for all of Earth, there really isn't much concern for overpopulation at this time.
Since fossil fuels aren't a food source or something similar, and instead are only used for heat and electricity, so long as we can find better alternatives (and start using them en masse), then we'll be around that limitation.
And an increasing population would, if anything, drive the world to seek for more renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind and tidal energy, and even nuclear.

Killing people off to solve this one problem with population wouldn't help. It would slightly slow it down, perhaps, but the world will adapt around it (and almost certainly for the better), so killing people off would slow down this journey to the next advancement in energy production.

you say "nature will create another disease" as if it's conditional upon us curing one. us curing diseases doesn't lead to nature "creating" diseases. dumb point.

then you go on to say that this money could be better used to 'feed staving people'? wtf? you based the top half of your post on overpopulation and now you want to give food to people who will then live and reproduce? you're inconsistent

badly structured argument, 2/10

it's alright guys, he's got nosources.

OK so          I DON'T KNOW... if there's anything worth reading somewhere in these 16 pages, but the thing with overpopulation is that it doesn't happen if you have a good healthy life.
Example: Sweden's population would most likely decrease if it weren't for all the immigration. Why? Because there's no reason to have sixteen kids anymore.
You usually don't want to take care of a lot of kids, one or two will do. Maybe three if you're weird. The population doesn't have any reason to increase as long as you live a good life.
I don't know why this thread is about cancer specifically when the real topic seems to be overpopulation.

We have never found a cure for cancer, only ways to prevent it or fight it off in early stages.  

I'm not defending anything except maybe a pure debate.  You still contributed nothing to this debate as before.  Dozens of others have said the same thing.
Your logic is so freaking flawed that it's no longer funny. Just because my opinion coincides with someone else's doesn't mean I can't say it. What did you expect? A unique conclusion from every single user? There's only so many things we can agree or disagree on. If I contributed nothing, what the forget have YOU done?


btw whats Snozola's previous name? pretty sure that he must be an alt or something
« Last Edit: October 12, 2012, 07:22:44 AM by Big Brother »

the thing with overpopulation is that it doesn't happen if you have a good healthy life.
The population doesn't have any reason to increase as long as you live a good life.
pity your whole point is destroyed by the number of cultures in the world where having 5+ kids is common practice and their definition of 'normal/ healthy/ good'

pity your whole point is destroyed by the number of cultures in the world where having 5+ kids is common practice and their definition of 'normal/ healthy/ good'
Dude, why do I care what pakis do


Dude, why do I care what pakis do
why do you care? no idea, ask yourself?

i'm just saying you shouldn't talk out of your ass lol. you've got no idea and you look stupid doing it

Saw that ninja ;)
Conclusion?? what is this post about? SPAM

why do you care? no idea, ask yourself?

i'm just saying you shouldn't talk out of your ass lol. you've got no idea and you look stupid doing it
I'm not talking out of my ass. thx.

I'm not talking out of my ass. thx.
well i dont know what you call it but making bad points supported by worse evidence generally points to asstalkery


well i dont know what you call it but making bad points supported by worse evidence generally points to asstalkery
I haven't made any direct points. I've talked about overpouplation. If you want to talk some more, and not just throw around insults, then please do.