Off Topic > Games
What Call of Duty was.
Swat 3:
Black Ops and World at War
4ever
Aphtonites:
--- Quote from: youtube comment ---back then cod games where not impresive(cod,united offensive,cod2,cod3)
they had almost no story,writing was bad and the multiplayer was casual,lack of depth and boring
its good it changed with cod4 or the francize would have been dead or forgotten
--- End quote ---
I feel like punching someone in the face.
The stories of the original call of duty games were great and tried to put you in the shoes of the soldiers who fought in the war, and this dude prefers generic "badass" war heroes who shoot people in slow motion.
Qwepir:
--- Quote from: Aphtonites on November 02, 2012, 01:41:48 PM ---
--- Quote ---multiplayer was casual
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
THE ONLY THING MORE CASUAL THAN MODERN COD IS PEGGLE.
Tokthree:
Realising how dumb comments are after you post them is a valuable learning experience.
But only if you edit them in time
Tomcat:
--- Quote from: fred da kiko on November 01, 2012, 10:19:11 PM ---You are wrong because none of the super soldier team is believable. The plot is handicapped and full of holes. How is loving following Reznov through the final fights of WWII and the attack on Berlin generic and poorly written. Explain how "shoot the national socialists to capture the final defensive position of the Germans to finally end the war" worse than "the russians attacked the US because an american was found shot in the head by a guy at a massacre in russia in an airport as part of a terrorist group that has no real ties to the us army so now we gotta kill all the russians and captain Shepard is a cunt."
--- End quote ---