Off Topic > Games

SPORE: Why it turned to stuff (also apparently spore versions)

Pages: << < (3/8) > >>

Jaxx:


--- Quote from: tails on November 15, 2012, 02:12:16 PM ---Nothing we didn't know back in 2008 when it was actually news.

--- End quote ---
it's not exactly been circulated what actually happened, so i can imagine, trite as it may sound, closure would be nice for some people.

fred da kiko:

Spore II: Science Edition.

Pixel:

Spore is still very fun. Im glad they removed the water stage, it looked very boring and was really redundant. I also have no problem with the cartoon-y look it has, Id rather a game than a science simulator.

YourBuddyBill:

I have some stuff to say on this topic, actually.

One of the things they removed was the ability to handle arms/legs/joints via what were essentially more backbones. You could have the backbones be split off, all different directions, and the Debug Squid from a very early alpha is thought to have given Spore it's logo. Sad that such a thing is impossible to currently recreate.
While I understand the Gameplay choice, it's still a scientific failure, and I think that a lot of the "removed" content should have stayed.

It's fun as a game, but it could have been funner, and don't use it for your Biology essay.

Jaxx:


--- Quote from: YourBuddyBill on November 15, 2012, 05:16:58 PM ---I have some stuff to say on this topic, actually.

One of the things they removed was the ability to handle arms/legs/joints via what were essentially more backbones. You could have the backbones be split off, all different directions, and the Debug Squid from a very early alpha is thought to have given Spore it's logo. Sad that such a thing is impossible to currently recreate.
While I understand the Gameplay choice, it's still a scientific failure, and I think that a lot of the "removed" content should have stayed.

It's fun as a game, but it could have been funner, and don't use it for your Biology essay.

--- End quote ---
SPORE: how "evolving" a creature basically makes the most defining argument for intelligent design ever.

Pages: << < (3/8) > >>

Go to full version