Author Topic: Man admits role in foiled, cat-related murder plot. (WHAT THE forget)  (Read 1401 times)

http://news.msn.com/us/man-admits-role-in-foiled-cat-related-murder-plot

This is just, I don't even... I have lost all faith in humanity and society.

You lost all faith in humanity and society because of one bad guy? :(

You lost all faith in humanity and society because of one bad guy? :(
you're implying that op thinks Riddler is better than this guy!

I'd lose faith in humanity because this guy named Osama Bin Laden plotted a terrorist attack on 9/11 by your standards, but I have not lost complete faith yet.

You lost all faith in humanity and society because of one bad guy? :(
It wasn't just the guy, it was his behavior said in the article and the way he was gonna murder that guy, was just sick, twisted and evil.

It wasn't just the guy, it was his behavior said in the article and the way he was gonna murder that guy, was just sick, twisted and evil.

...so it was just the guy.

Remember, child: One rusted bolt does not make a city fall.

So, humanity has lost it's faith in humanity 1000s of times the way you're using it
I've just lost all my faith in humanity

wtf how is a cat supposed to murder someone
that doesn't even make sense to blame it on a cat, like really blame it on a larger animal

Quote
a former corporate attorney who long had pursued a loveual relationship with Nash's wife.
DUN
DUN
DUNNNNNNNN

Nash. Jon Nash, mathemetician.
Math. Addition, subtraction.
Sub. Submarines, or underwater ships.
Ships. What kind of ships? Sailing, fishing?
Fish. Something fishy.
Fizz. League of Legends.
Singed.

case closed



This man does not approve.

Nash. Jon Nash, mathemetician.
Math. Addition, subtraction.
Sub. Submarines, or underwater ships.
Ships. What kind of ships? Sailing, fishing?
Fish. Something fishy.
Fizz. League of Legends.
Singed.

case closed
By the transitive property of equality:
Nash = League of Legends
Therefore:
Quote
a former corporate attorney who long had pursued a loveual relationship with League of Legends' wife.

By the transitive property of equality:
Nash = League of Legends
Therefore:
You, my good sir, are incorrect, obviously, because while your logic is technically valid, League of Legends has never had a wife.
However, I don't know about Singed. Maybe he has a secret...



This man does not approve.
This man sucks badly and shouldn't have been elected.

This man sucks badly and shouldn't have been elected.
Cite your sources please
I give this sentence a plagiarism grade, you're expelled.