SickBrick (Sci fi FPS)

Off Topic > Games

<< < (3/4) > >>

Katamari007:

--- Quote from: BlockoCrafter on December 07, 2012, 04:58:40 PM ---I can't think of any games made in '03 that look like this.

--- End quote ---

..really?

Shell:
I tried the demo.

It's really bad. The enemies are uninteresting and the guns are uninteresting and the story is uninteresting

I was bored with the game within 5 minutes (literally). It's just boring, the animations are terrible, the art style is silly, and it's overall a crappy game. It's trying to be like quake or doom or unreal tournament + adding a good story but it doesn't work because the story sucks and it's not as good as the 3 i mentioned

2/10 would not play for more than 5 minutes

BlockoCrafter:

--- Quote from: Katamari007 on December 07, 2012, 05:16:17 PM ---..really?

--- End quote ---
Yes. Someone else can probably think of one, but not me.

--- Quote from: Marcem on December 07, 2012, 05:02:42 PM ---Looks a lot like either Doom 3 or Ion Storm's Unreal 2 games.

--- End quote ---
After searching up, Doom 3 was made in 2005, and games like Killing Floor don't look as hi-poly.

Besides, graphics don't really make a game bad. I mean, Blockland is a good game, even though its engine might be 9 years old.

Cookiez664:

There's average graphics guys. Which one looks better? :)

yeah. Most average games don't have mega graphics. Unless you are playing games meant to be graphically stunning like BO2 or FarCry 3.

Shell:
Graphics don't help when the gameplay sucks.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version