Off Topic > Games
SickBrick (Sci fi FPS)
Katamari007:
--- Quote from: BlockoCrafter on December 07, 2012, 04:58:40 PM ---I can't think of any games made in '03 that look like this.
--- End quote ---
..really?
Shell:
I tried the demo.
It's really bad. The enemies are uninteresting and the guns are uninteresting and the story is uninteresting
I was bored with the game within 5 minutes (literally). It's just boring, the animations are terrible, the art style is silly, and it's overall a crappy game. It's trying to be like quake or doom or unreal tournament + adding a good story but it doesn't work because the story sucks and it's not as good as the 3 i mentioned
2/10 would not play for more than 5 minutes
BlockoCrafter:
--- Quote from: Katamari007 on December 07, 2012, 05:16:17 PM ---..really?
--- End quote ---
Yes. Someone else can probably think of one, but not me.
--- Quote from: Marcem on December 07, 2012, 05:02:42 PM ---Looks a lot like either Doom 3 or Ion Storm's Unreal 2 games.
--- End quote ---
After searching up, Doom 3 was made in 2005, and games like Killing Floor don't look as hi-poly.
Besides, graphics don't really make a game bad. I mean, Blockland is a good game, even though its engine might be 9 years old.
Cookiez664:
There's average graphics guys. Which one looks better? :)
yeah. Most average games don't have mega graphics. Unless you are playing games meant to be graphically stunning like BO2 or FarCry 3.
Shell:
Graphics don't help when the gameplay sucks.