explain to me why AMD processors are 'poop', please? Please include technical information, no AMD is cheaper/not as fast bullstuff.
Comparatively, Intel processors perform better when you are in the higher end market to their counterparts. You might not want to hear that but its true if you develop an average for benchmarking results.
AMD is always playing technological catchup. A good handful of their higher core CPUs don't have the "true" amount of cores. Its a bit of a corner cutting so they can appeal to the market of gamers trying to save a buck without the heaviest of compromises.
AMD processors are often better suited to laptops and budget gaming rigs, and its no accident we see this time and time again. If you are going all out and building an expensive rig, it is mad to cop out with an AMD processor.
If you are building a budget to medium gaming rig, it can be an alright choice. For a high ender, its a bit mad to go with an AMD. Many computer assemblers will agree.
"Poop" is a harsh way to put it. Perhaps a few steps behind and never ahead, is a better way to look at it.
edit: just to add, in my experience, AMD CPUs are more likely to bone up with age. Can't really use that as an argument point because it could be coincidence. Less reliable imo.
