| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| [MEGATHREAD] Personal Computer - Updated builds thanks to Logical Increments |
| << < (3284/4060) > >> |
| espio100:
--- Quote from: Georges on November 06, 2015, 04:46:18 PM ---What he said was that motherboard does support 1866 MHz RAM like the RAM you have in the PCPartpicker build. He thinks you should get RAM that is clocked at 1600 MHz and a lower CAS latency rating. The RAM you have selected has a CAS latency of 10. In otherwords, get a different motherboard or get slower RAM. --- End quote --- Where can I actually see the max CAS latency or whatever the the motherboard can support? |
| Alyx Vance:
--- Quote from: espio100 on November 06, 2015, 04:37:57 PM ---Scuse the forget out of me im not a nerd. --- End quote --- What I'm saying is that you dismissed all of it because 'nvidya master race' and asked for an answer you didn't understand. Didn't even try to learn what he said. |
| Oasis:
--- Quote from: espio100 on November 06, 2015, 04:37:57 PM ---Scuse the forget out of me im not a nerd. --- End quote --- Then stop trying. |
| Georges:
--- Quote from: espio100 on November 06, 2015, 04:56:30 PM ---Where can I actually see the max CAS latency or whatever the the motherboard can support? --- End quote --- I don't think it not supporting the CAS latency that is the issue here. A lower CAS latency is generally better, and having a lower one would sort of make up for the loss of speed in the RAM if you got 1600 MHz instead of 1866 MHz. |
| espio100:
--- Quote from: Alyx Vance on November 06, 2015, 04:57:25 PM ---What I'm saying is that you dismissed all of it because 'nvidya master race' and asked for an answer you didn't understand. Didn't even try to learn what he said. --- End quote --- How the forget should I know he what 1833 meant? 1833 Cows? Atleast put Mhz's or something behind it so normal people would know what he was talking about. I didnt even know how was talking about my ram. I tought all he said was some motherboard bs. --- Quote from: Georges on November 06, 2015, 05:00:19 PM ---I don't think it not supporting the CAS latency that is the issue here. A lower CAS latency is generally better, and having a lower one would sort of make up for the loss of speed in the RAM if you got 1600 MHz instead of 1866 MHz. --- End quote --- Ah I see. Anyways if I where to keep this one (will probably chinge it) will it just get bottlenecked by the motherboard or will the whole thing explode? Anyways the lowest CAS I ould find withing my price range is 9. Anyways if I just replace the motherboard with this one, is it any difference or?? EDIT: Anyways x3. wow my vocabulary is wide. --- Quote from: Alyx Vance on November 06, 2015, 05:03:45 PM ---Yes, it's cows. Totally not Mhz. Personal Farming Megathread - Updated land thanks to FFA --- End quote --- Its the principle, not the example dipstuff |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |