| Off Topic > Games |
| Why are Civil war games so widely ignored by game makers? |
| << < (11/12) > >> |
| fred da kiko:
--- Quote from: sir dooble on February 14, 2013, 06:27:18 PM ---Mount & Blade: Napoleonic Wars does manage to do a decent job at it. But, I do agree that it's not as fast-paced as games with automatic or semi-automatic weapons. But there is also an appeal to that sort of warfare for numerous people. Myself and OP included. --- End quote --- There's a reason that the games you'd want to play are resigned to the budget of hobbyist games like farming simulator or train sims, only like 6 people would buy the game after it gets a 0.5 metascore. |
| Ceist:
they should make a game after the Syrian Revolution. |
| TeslaCoil:
Pretty much the same with world war 1 games Call of Duty: Trenches of World War 1 Sitting in two ditches for hours on end in a constant grindfest of chemically bombing the stuff out of eachother. Everyone dies. Uses a last generation engine. They will make millions |
| DestroyerOfBlocks:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Conquest love me |
| comr4de:
--- Quote from: DestroyerOfBlocks on February 15, 2013, 12:23:51 AM ---en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Conquest love me --- End quote --- I'm interested as to why the game was rated high but is relatively unknown. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |