Off Topic > Games
Why are Civil war games so widely ignored by game makers?
fred da kiko:
--- Quote from: sir dooble on February 14, 2013, 06:27:18 PM ---Mount & Blade: Napoleonic Wars does manage to do a decent job at it.
But, I do agree that it's not as fast-paced as games with automatic or semi-automatic weapons. But there is also an appeal to that sort of warfare for numerous people. Myself and OP included.
--- End quote ---
There's a reason that the games you'd want to play are resigned to the budget of hobbyist games like farming simulator or train sims, only like 6 people would buy the game after it gets a 0.5 metascore.
Ceist:
they should make a game after the Syrian Revolution.
TeslaCoil:
Pretty much the same with world war 1 games
Call of Duty: Trenches of World War 1
Sitting in two ditches for hours on end in a constant grindfest of chemically bombing the stuff out of eachother. Everyone dies. Uses a last generation engine.
They will make millions
DestroyerOfBlocks:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Conquest
love me
comr4de:
--- Quote from: DestroyerOfBlocks on February 15, 2013, 12:23:51 AM ---en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Conquest
love me
--- End quote ---
I'm interested as to why the game was rated high but is relatively unknown.