Author Topic: Ben Grapevine - Thread stuffting.  (Read 3139 times)


No, but seriously, clear example of going off topic.

Okay, so I was wrong; but my point still stands regarding Ben Grapevine.

i don't know, didn't he mean like "from few to many strokes over the last decade"?

regardless of that, this is a stupid argument that shouldn't even exist. both sides are horribly overreacting.


here's another thread-stuffting post by yours truly
stfu richardhead

here's another thread-stuffting post by yours truly
If anything what rub said would be thread stuffting

If anything what rub said would be thread stuffting

except he had the right to know where the new panel was, as he is a customer of kaphost.

Glass, you can't even keep your word. Never return you said, comes back two more times.
This off-topic. This thread is about Ben, not Glass.

Just because he wants to correct their grammar doesn't mean it's drama worthy. However, I don't think he should have done it.

'few to many'
it wasn't 'a few to many', which would've been 'a few too many'
jeez it was correct

'few to many'
it wasn't 'a few to many', which would've been 'a few too many'
jeez it was correct
Actually it wasn't.

"(few to many strokes over last decade)"

"Too" would be correct in this sentence.

I get that "few to many" makes sense, such as going from a small quantity(few) to bigger quantity(many).
But in the way he used it, "too" would be the correct word.

Anyway we don't need to be fighting over this.

Anyway we don't need to be fighting over this.
I here by dub you, Sir. Blockzillahead, an Intellegent Person.

Just because he wants to correct their grammar doesn't mean it's drama worthy. However, I don't think he should have done it.
It's not that they corrected them, its that they took it that far. It was really rude to the OP.

It's not that they corrected them, its that they took it that far. It was really rude to the OP.
I agree. That's why I said he shouldn't have done it.