Black Mesa VS Aperture Science

Off Topic > Games

<< < (18/19) > >>

Dodger:
Black Mesa owns the hell out of Aperature. At least Black Mesa scientists could make a functioning AI (Dog). Also, Black Mesa is better at selecting employees (Gordon, Barney, Eli, etc.).

Also, the Resonance Cascade was G-Man's fault, not Black Mesa's

Tudoreleuu:
well, if you bring in DOG, there'd also atlas and p-body

great work including stuff that aperture invented decepticon

also I think aperture's a bit more dedicated. black mesa had a huge budget and barely managed to invent anything before it started a world war, while aperture science, with a smaller budget, continued to test and invent in their awesome underground base

Tudoreleuu:
science isn't about why, it's about bumping the thread

Tonkka²:
I wonder if any of the Aperture workers ever took a sample of those repulsion and other gels with them and tried to use them on their richards for extra fun procrastination/love sessions.

Qwepir:

--- Quote from: Tudoreleuu on March 13, 2013, 01:19:54 AM ---black mesa had a huge budget and barely managed to invent anything before it started a world war, while aperture science, with a smaller budget, continued to test and invent in their awesome underground base

--- End quote ---
Just because you dont see all of BM's stuff in the games doesn't mean they didn't do as much. Black Mesa was a government-funded research juggernaut, Aperture was a private corporation led by a bloody lunatic. Aperture tech may have been more sophisticated, but Black Mesa's research was applicable to things outside of puzzle games.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version