Just wondering, why is everyone against the Gun Control bill?

[Harm94]

4. No, you don't just look at the gunman's hand. That isn't the situation at all.

Because you want to disarm him. Tell me how you are going to disarm a guy with a gun when he has you at a distance.

[Ad Bot]

[ResonKinetic]

Anyways, I'm just gonna go ahead and rap this up by saying that I feel like assault rifles could give the upper hand to people who actually need that protection.

Whether or not assault rifles have the upper hand or not depends on every detail of a situation.

[ResonKinetic]

The whole situation has been that both parties have a gun aimed at each other.

EDIT: loving double-post.

[Kimon]

Whether or not assault rifles have the upper hand or not depends on every detail of a situation.

Using the example you provided, an assault rifle would give you the extreme upper hand.

1. Neither do you, or at least you haven't proven it.
2. That picture is not the discussed situation, and even if it were, I would have a way out of that.
3. You really have no idea what we're talking about, do you?
4. No, you don't just look at the gunman's hand. That isn't the situation at all.

Wake the forget up, just because you go hunting doesn't mean you're some gunman badass that can stop criminals all of a sudden. If you were unarmed with a gun pointed to your head, you would try something stupid rather than simply give him what he wants?

You still haven't explained to me your ambiguous implication from earlier, by the way.

[Harm94]

The whole situation has been that both parties have a gun aimed at each other.

EDIT: loving double-post.

Nope, all you said your intent was to disarm. It was never mentioned if the victim had a gun too. Therefore I assumed that would disarm a guy without one. Here is the quote here.

And just for your information, my first instinct isn't to kill. It's to disarm.

I have a heart you know.

[Kimon]

Nope, all you said your intent was to disarm.

I think he meant to imply that he had a gun too BUT HES NOT VERY GOOD AT THAT IS HE

[ResonKinetic]

Nope, all you said your intent was to disarm. It was never mentioned if the victim had a gun too. Therefore I assumed that would disarm a guy without one. Here is the quote here.

To disarm a guy from a distance without a firearm of your own is absurd and would require supernatural abilities to even perform such wizardry.

I think he meant to imply that he had a gun too BUT HES NOT VERY GOOD AT THAT IS HE

I've said this before, but I have my ups and downs with conversational tact depending on what's going on in my life.

It's not too often I have a god damn debate about whether a handgun is as good as a rifle with teenagers.

[Kimon]

To disarm a guy from a distance without a firearm of your own is absurd and would require supernatural abilities to even perform such wizardry.

I've said this before, but I have my ups and downs with conversational tact depending on what's going on in my life.

It's not too often I have a god damn debate about whether a handgun is as good as a rifle with teenagers.

Well to do that you would basically have to shoot the person to get them to drop the gun. That had a pretty good chance of killing the person, assuming they don't kill you for it if you forget up.

Also why were you acting so knowledgeable and roostery if you are bad at proving your point?

[ResonKinetic]

Well to do that you would basically have to shoot the person to get them to drop the gun.

That's exactly what I've been trying to say the whole time! Thank you!

Also why were you acting so knowledgeable and roostery if you are bad at proving your point?

I don't know. I thought I was proving my point correctly, but like I said, I'm a weird variable.

I might just come off that way.

[Kimon]

That's exactly what I've been trying to say the whole time! Thank you!

Edit: That has a pretty good chance of killing the person, assuming they don't kill you for it if you forget up. You'd have to be pretty sure you could actually pull that off, especially if you didn't want to kill them.

[ResonKinetic]

God damn edits.

That had a pretty good chance of killing the person,

Collateral damage is not my fault. At that point, it's in God's hands, to me.

if you forget up.

Well, it didn't happen before.

[Kimon]

Yeah but I'm just saying you were intent on not killing them, and that seems like it would just be another way of killing your attacker.

I'm gonna go ahead and go to sleep now but yeah all that other stuff.

[ResonKinetic]

Yeah but I'm just saying you were intent on not killing them, and that seems like it would just be another way of killing your attacker.

I'm gonna go ahead and go to sleep now but yeah all that other stuff.

Yeaaah. All disagreements aside, I'd still have your babies.

God damn it, my post quality is degrading. I'm tired.

Good night.

[Nitro_Weavile]

The constitution was written to regulate the federal government, and they cannot change what it's rights to citizens are, plus, the government has no right to tell us what we need

[Thé Lord Tony]

Ignorance

The ignorant one is the child enthusiast.