To be fair you did the exact same thing on Sony topics
I only once predicted for a joke that Sony was going to put a touchscreen on the controller to rip-off the Wii U. I was right, but afterwards i said that it has a lot of potential like the Wii U does. Although for some reason, when they announced the touchscreen for the Wii U Lord Tony said "Ha, its just a non-portable DS. Who would want that?" and when Sony showed off theirs he said "Multiple functions can be added on to the touchscreen and it will be very useful in different games", as if the touchscreen was completely Sony's idea and an intelligent move, completely disregarding the fact that Wii U had it first. Infact, DS had it first.
he's right about the vita being loving amazing though
seriously it is
Yes it is, until you notice how limited the library is when it comes to good lengthy games.
Sony had the patent for the Playstation move way before Nintendo came up with the Wii.
Also Sony has been using hands free motion controlled gaming before the xbox came out with kinect. It was called eyetoy for playstation 2.
Except Nintendo NES and SNES had 'motion controls' 20 years earlier with the Zapper, PowerGlove and Superscope.
Pretty sure Nintendo wasn't the first one to use the motion control gimmick either Yes they did, at least the first home video game console to do them, and just because you say its a gimmick it doesn't mean that its a bad thing. , too bad it really is a gimmick Yeah, i could call SIXAXIS a gimmick too. because the games that weren't rail shooters ended up not using it or having obnoxious controls that forces you to use the stick. If you gave it some time you get used to them. I found Mario Galaxy extremely tedious but once i learned how to point the wii mote to the sensor bar i had no problems.
SSBB didn't even use any actual motion controls. Menu navigation. I'm pretty sure it did use something since you could play the game with the Nunchuck and Wiimote.
Seriously, stop calling everything a damn gimmick.
