[Forum Petition] Make the "Do not flame" rule more descriptive

Blockland Forums > Suggestions & Requests

<< < (11/14) > >>

skill4life:

--- Quote from: BlueCacti on July 29, 2013, 12:08:05 AM ---"wow this guy posted nudity!"
"okay i reported him and after people report something they usually say "get banned" so i guess ill say that"

you were banned: flaming

"why was i banned? what did i do?, i looked i what i was posting and i knew what i was posting why was i banned for flaming?"

--- End quote ---

The only thing is, blockguy123 was extremely loving dismissive in his post.
"Get loving banned" that's pretty harsh, especially towards a picture posted in a you laugh you lose thread.

and the image he directed his post at:

The image has nudity but it's really nothing to get your panties in a knot about. There's just skin, no real adult content in it.

Acerblock:
Again, people have said that and worst and they haven't gotten banned.

skill4life:

--- Quote from: Acerblock on July 29, 2013, 12:57:09 AM ---Again, people have said that and worst and they haven't gotten banned.

--- End quote ---
Link me an example

.::Taboo::.:

--- Quote from: Acerblock on July 29, 2013, 12:56:07 AM ---I actually agree with this drama. Many people have said the same exact thing that blockguy123 has, and haven't gotten banned. Not sure why you guys are calling Cacti a white knight, considering the no flaming rule is not specific at all.

--- End quote ---
this is probably because their posts weren't dumb as hell and directed towards an entertaining image in an entertaining thread with bullstuff reasoning

Nonnel:

--- Quote from: .::Taboo::. on July 29, 2013, 12:53:51 AM ---Congratulations, you win the thread.

--- End quote ---
He would've if he said the eye color was maroon.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version