[Forum Petition] Make the "Do not flame" rule more descriptive

Blockland Forums > Suggestions & Requests

<< < (2/14) > >>

Mura:
How about people stop using the words "forget" and "stuff" so abundantly their posts wouldn't be interpreted as flaming.

That and it makes you look immature and stupid.

Blockzillahead:
No support. It's self explanatory.
By the way it says "entire point of your post" not "entire post" and even if it did say that "entire" doesn't mean "long."

BlueCacti:

--- Quote from: Kyro on July 28, 2013, 09:12:36 PM ---Pretty much this. I do think that it was a pretty unnecessary ban, if it's not perma, then I'm not that upset.

--- End quote ---
it was a perma

sir dooble:
I see where you're coming from.

But Blockguys ban there was fair in that his post was just flaming at someone.
Even "is this bannable" is better than what he said.
Or he could simply ignore it and report it if he felt it was against the rules.

I do think it would be nice if the No Flaming rule was slightly more specific and explained that short lines insulting or swearing at someone, like blockguy did, also count as flaming.

Frankie²:

--- Quote from: BlueCacti on July 28, 2013, 09:16:17 PM ---it was a perma

--- End quote ---
did you make this thread because he was banned and because he's your friend?
now, i cant be a one to proclaim the rules are perfect and that badspot is fair 100% of the time but seriously?
the rules are fine as is
if you dont think you should post it you probably shouldnt

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version