I'm sorry that I upset your feelings, but you need to face the facts that if you were the builder of this city, and finds out that someone is hosting a server with your build. You would confront this as stolen. Now it gets you more angryer when the host don't even know the name of the person who build this. But if you don't agree with me, that's alright because we have our opinions. Opinions is opinions you cant change it. I apologize for being a wannabe smart ass. I'm sorry to make you guys upset, I didn't really mean to. I'm sorry for being an jackass, all mistakes will lies at me. I really didn't know what I was saying anyways. Again I'm sorry please forgive me.
Thank you 
I think I can maybe sort out two points that caused this whole argument.
First of all, "Stealing" in Blockland isn't all that bad.
If I save someone elses work and host it on my server, then it's only bad if I claim it to be mine. That is me trying to take credit for someone elses work and possibly even gain popularity based on that.
If I save someone's work and host it, but do not claim it is mine, then it's not a problem. I am simply enjoying someone elses work while I can, and showing it off to other people for them to enjoy. So long as I don't claim I made it, then no credit is stolen from the original builder.
For some, myself included, having someone host your work can be a good thing. It means that other people can enjoy it when you're not able to host it. In Blockland, a game based around building things and sharing and playing, that's quite a big goal for a lot of people.
Navaro is of the view that he has caused no harm to the person who created the build. It was not his intention to claim credit for someone elses work.
The second point is from these three images.



You asked Navaro if he knew the creator of the build. Navaro responded "not personally".
In most cases, the term "knowing personally" means to actually be in contact with someone and have discoursed with them.
It isn't the same as "knowing them".
For example, I know the celebrity Brad Pitt.
I do not know him personally however, as I have never met him nor talked to him.
When you asked Navaro if he knew the builder and he replied "not personally" he meant to infer that he
does know the builder, but not on a personal level.
Which is why he later gave the name of LegoPepper and his BLID.
You didn't understand that Navaro had initially said he knew of the creator.
So, understandably, when he suddenly gave his name and ID, it was weird and suspicious.
Navaro replied to this in similar confusion, because he had already explained he knew the builder.
From here on in, you two were arguing because you both got confused and annoyed with each other.
You both, and later Zoltan too, became aggressive and rude. Navaro swore at you, and you seemingly threatened him with a drama topic.
Hair simply has an alternate view on build "stealing".
While his view isn't always agreed on by everyone, it is fair, as people "stealing" and claiming credit for a build is common and isn't very nice.
He simply wanted to enquire into the build and make sure you weren't claiming credit. He didn't want you to hurt the original builder, nor be picked out on by others for taking credit.
He was too forthcoming, but I don't think he had bad intentions.
The entire argument really came down to a small disagreement in opinion and confusion in language.
You then got to arguing quite heatedly and in quite a petty manner too.
I don't think you were being a decent person during the argument at all, Navaro.
You did swear at and insult Hair, and you rallied Zoltan and -Tommy- against Hair, as well as tried to rally Snoz too.
Hair got desperate when he was being picked on from all sides. Which is why he threw in the "illegal" argument and the link. You're right in that it doesn't apply to Blockland. But Hair didn't have anything else to say and probably wasn't thinking overly rationally in a heated argument.
You should either have stopped arguing, or simply kicked or banned Hair.
There was no need to drag the argument on, and there was no need on either side for threatening to Drama and "counter-drama" each other.
I think everyone involved needs to maybe calm themselves down a little bit and think a bit more before you act.