| Blockland Forums > General Discussion |
| free blockland online dedicated hosting? |
| << < (5/7) > >> |
| hammereditor²:
--- Quote from: Raven¢roft on September 06, 2013, 12:00:08 PM ---Hamhost looks like garbage IMO. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: xSetrox on August 27, 2013, 08:37:12 PM ---I think it's time for me to give a review. Hamhost is incredibly reliable. Hammereditor, it's hoster, treats his clients amazingly. He is on most of the time, and does his best to fix any issues you have with the service. His customer service is so reliable, in fact, that he actually added features that I asked him to. I cannot remember him ever saying "nah" or "maybe" or "no thanks". He really deserves more customers, and money. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Reindeer on August 13, 2013, 09:45:40 PM ---I have been running my server for close to 8 hours now using this service and have had a few people in the server, no lag at all and no crashing. The connection is fine and fast and reliable. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: boodals 2 on August 16, 2013, 03:20:10 PM ---Yay. <3 I went onto Pacnet2013's server to see how good the hosting is, I had 200 latency (pretty average for me) with around 10-15 players all spamming projectiles. Very nice. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Reindeer on August 13, 2013, 04:26:32 PM ---Hammer is doing his very best to run this, the service is also very efficient too and he actually treats his clients as people and is always willing to help his clients whatever the time of day it may be. He is professional, and he doesn't slack. He takes the service seriously, and treats his clients more like his friends. I think that you should try the service out, it is worth a try. The service may not be a royalty 5 star service - but it serves it's purpose as being a quick and easy dedicated free server provider. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: xSetrox on August 09, 2013, 04:32:31 PM ---Thanks. Nice, this has good customer service. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Yenola³ on August 09, 2013, 02:06:25 PM ---I think it's good seeing other hosting companies come up, I mean obviously RTB has the superior service right now, but it's good to have variety. Wish you the best of luck, this looks alright so far --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Xeidious* on August 11, 2013, 05:10:56 PM ---I've been using this for the past 2 days without any lag or problems, it took me an extra 10 minutes to figure out what i was doing, and hammer is trying really hard to do this he gives me pretty good customer service given that this is free atm. So please, don't go making assumptions, and this goes for everyone. --- End quote --- Would you wait indefinitely with CBM, probably for at least 2 months, or just use HamHost and wait for a maximum of 24 hours before setup? Since we now have a new VPS, I estimate that the CPU is about 20% better than CBMhost, according to PassMark CPU benchmark results. I believe that HamHost has about 11 slots left. |
| hammereditor²:
--- Quote from: Slammer1337 on September 05, 2013, 07:26:09 PM ---Nope, you need to pay money if you're using Kalphiter's, RTB's, and other dedicated hosting services Otherwise your server will just have to run on your internet connection. --- End quote --- You can use HamHost for free, or get more features by paying for it. |
| Nal:
--- Quote from: hammereditor² on September 06, 2013, 03:18:44 PM ---You can use HamHost for free, or get more features by paying for it. --- End quote --- can I get a server to use, what are the benefits? |
| hammereditor²:
--- Quote from: Nal on September 06, 2013, 03:30:11 PM ---can I get a server to use, what are the benefits? --- End quote --- * There are only 10 clients so far, so average CPU usage is about 6%, according to Performance Monitor logs. * It's a completely free service with no waiting lists like CBMhost. Your account gets set up within 24 hours. * If you want more control panel features and a higher CPU priority, you can pay $3.50/month for premium access. * We offer auto save and console.log archiving for premium users. CBMhost and Kaphost do not have this.Just read the HamHost forum topic for more information. Just because |
| Matthew Padilla:
--- Quote from: hammereditor² on September 06, 2013, 03:43:22 PM --- * There are only 10 clients so far, so average CPU usage is about 6%, according to Performance Monitor logs. * It's a completely free service with no waiting lists like CBMhost. Your account gets set up within 24 hours. * If you want more control panel features and a higher CPU priority, you can pay $3.50/month for premium access. * We offer auto save and console.log archiving for premium users. CBMhost and Kaphost do not have this.Just read the HamHost forum topic for more information. Just because --- End quote --- So for $3 dollars and 50 cents more you'll just change the priority, enable autosaving and log a <10MB .log file? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |