Author Topic: Reporting a moderator for a possible rule violation is a bannable offense  (Read 28581 times)

I don't get it. I was just banned for publicly appealing a ban.

How is that even possible? What's going on?
Woah :0

I feel a little frightened right now...
at how fast Kalphiter registers with new keys...
(lol)

Woah :0

I feel a little frightened right now...
at how fast Kalphiter registers with new keys...
(lol)
These aren't new keys; don't feel afraid.

Woah :0

I feel a little frightened right now...
at how fast Kalphiter registers with new keys...
(lol)

He's the new glass

I honestly don't care if it was Kalphiter or not. Ephialtes' corruption has really shown the past few days. I don't care if he's a forum moderator or not. His job is to enforce the rules, not break them then ban someone for reporting it. Same thing with the Lightbulbs ban. I saw it as an abuse of power. Unless Ephialtes knew that Lightbulbs had some sort of connection with spencer2015, billing address or IP address, he really had no right to ban the guy for defending himself. It seemed like he banned the guy based off assumptions though. My opinion doesn't really matter in this situation, but I just wanted to give my thoughts on Ephialtes actions as of late.

Badspot later backed up my ban with his own information. Sorry you decided that your own investigations overrule that of well informed people but you're going to have to live with it.

Badspot later backed up my ban with his own information. Sorry you decided that your own investigations overrule that of well informed people but you're going to have to live with it.
I never said anywhere or showed any sign that my investigations overrule yours. I simply looked into it because your ban seemed like an assumption. I also stated
Unless Ephialtes knew that Lightbulbs had some sort of connection with spencer2015, billing address or IP address...
because I knew that you could possibly have that information, but had not given any proof of it at the time.

I never said anywhere or showed any sign that my investigations overrule yours. I simply looked into it because your ban seemed like an assumption. I also stated  because I knew that you could possibly have that information, but had not given any proof of it at the time.

I still don't see why you would ever take the word of a troll over a forum moderators. It boggles my mind.

Anyway almost all of these arguments is just people with butthurt grudges again someone. When someone points something out that is against a person they dislike, everyone else with similar views jump onto it like flies on stuff.

I found enough evidence to convince myself the ban was just, and I banned him. My job isn't to explain and justify my actions to forum users who decide I'm abusing my position.


Coming to a theater near you

Kalphiter⁵ - The Revengenance


except

Glass's keys weren't new either until badspot revoked all his keys.

Usually if you false report you get your reporting abilities taken away from you. Not a ban.
(By false report I mean report a post that isn't actually a rule broken)
Happened to me. I can't report anymore :(

Don't think it would qualify as a ban though...
Besides this, there's really not much you can do.

Imagine the entire forums as an empire for Badspot. You do something wrong, off with your head. You challenge Badspot or his moderators, off with your head.

If you don't like it, the door's right there... or you'll get decapitated like the last two times.

Coming to a theater near you

Kalphiter⁵ - The Revengenance
hehehe

I still don't see why you would ever take the word of a troll over a forum moderators. It boggles my mind.
Oh wow, are you serious right now? Nobody knew if lightbulbs was spencer or not at the time. I was puzzled about it as well. 50% thought he was spencer, 50% thought he wasn't. I didn't take his word, I compiled all of the events that happened and came up with my own conclusion as to whether he was spencer or not. Obviously I was wrong.

Oh wow, are you serious right now? Nobody knew if lightbulbs was spencer or not at the time. I was puzzled about it as well. 50% thought he was spencer, 50% thought he wasn't. I didn't take his word, I compiled all of the events that happened and came up with my own conclusion as to whether he was spencer or not. Obviously I was wrong.

Doesn't matter if he was Spencer or not, he still tried to start up stuff and get people angry on purpose. He's a troll.

Almost forgot the reason:


It doesn't make any damn sense.

Kalphiter, do you ever stop?