Author Topic: Malleo100 being handicapped.  (Read 4311 times)

No, my entire point was not relating Malleo's behavior to Muslim's behavior.

As much as you hate it, Muslim is accepted here. If we start acting like Malleo does the same stuff as Muslim, it's logical to connect the dots that he's going to assume that he's accepted here, just like Muslim, which is not correct.

There's just a whole goddamn slew of reasons of why you shouldn't of acted the way you acted and I've pointed them all out to you and all you've said so far is "well you can't make me".

As much as you hate it, Muslim is accepted here.
i think you're pulling that from the same hole you're getting the rest of this crap from lol

the only reason you've jumped on this is because it's convenient for you. you've already said that. you don't like this malleo guy and you're willing to let anything else slide as long as people "flame" him instead of the OP.

you have my sincere apologies that i'm not bending to your whims!

i think you're pulling that from the same hole you're getting the rest of this crap from lol

Muslim has found a way to survive here. He's not exactly smart, but by whatever means, he's accepted here.

I don't really know what ambiguous message you're trying to deliver here but I hope that covers it.

the only reason you've jumped on this is because it's convenient for you. you've already said that. you don't like this malleo guy and you're willing to let anything else slide as long as people "flame" him instead of the OP.

I'm not asking anyone to flame Malleo, I'm asking you to not flame OP because then Malleo will just justify his own actions. Flaming Muslim in this thread is incredibly inefficient, It's not going to pack any punch towards Muslim and it's just going to take the spotlight off the actual subject at hand.

Truth is, you don't give a stuff about either of these people, you're just going to write them both off as handicaps and flame both of them whenever you get the chance because that is what you do. I'm not asking anyone to go up in arms over any certain side or person, and it's not only you, people do this crap all the time and so many handicaps just get away with being handicaps because of it and they never change.

Flaming Muslim in this thread is incredibly inefficient, It's not going to pack any punch towards Muslim and it's just going to take the spotlight off the actual subject at hand.
I don't classify it as flaming, but calling him on being an idiot already did get a result:
Look, yes, I was being an idiot. You're allowed to call me out for my own stupidity.
What's that, the OP of this thread thinks we're allowed to call him on his actions too? *gasp*

lmao doubt it, almost completely certain he just said that to avoid a conflict.

Even so, yeah, you're 'allowed' to. you're allowed to do whatever the hell you want as long as it's not against the rules, I can't stop you. SHOULD you do it is the question that's actually worthy of asking.

people SHOULD be held equally accountable for their own actions when making a drama topic

that's the way it's always been done. the only time there are issues is when people like you try to change the standards because it suits an agenda

people SHOULD be held equally accountable for their own actions when making a drama topic
What, so a Drama is only valid if it's made by the right person?

Yeah, everyone should be held equally accountable for their actions but this is not a personal problem between Muslim and Malleo. This topic should speak for the community if not a large majority of it, the vast majority not being handicaps. By trying to turn it away from Malleo onto Muslim, you've cheated a vast majority of the community who actually want to see change in Malleo.

And as I said earlier, you don't give a stuff about either of these people, and so you really don't care if either of them change as long as you get to throw stuff at them and justify it.

What, so a Drama is only valid if it's made by the right person?
A drama's validity will be influenced by the actions of BOTH parties involved in the drama. There's no logical reason why that shouldn't be the case.

And don't try and say i've cheated anyone. you are equally responsible for turning this thread away from it's initial point, get off your high horse lol.

And don't try and say i've cheated anyone. you are equally responsible for turning this thread away from it's initial point, get off your high horse lol.
I've MADE my point concerning Malleo, and as I've said before, by defending my point I'm defending my stance against Malleo.

A drama's validity will be influenced by the actions of BOTH parties involved in the drama. There's no logical reason why that shouldn't be the case.
Unless Muslim was deliberately winding Malleo up to get a response out of him, I don't see how this makes any logical sense.

A Drama's validity should be based on whether or not the content / accusation is backed up and valid. I don't understand how the accuser's previous behavior would change either of those variables.

A Drama's validity should be based on whether or not the content / accusation is backed up and valid. I don't understand how the accuser's previous behavior would change either of those variables.
I'm not even talking about their previous behaviour though? I'm talking about their behaviour directly tied to the drama.

Muslim was not some innocent party here. I listed 4 of the posts that I found of muslim being an idiot fishing for a response from Malleo. If Malleo is an idiot apart from that, cool, i've never denied that.

Muslim was not some innocent party here. I listed 4 of the posts that I found of muslim being an idiot fishing for a response from Malleo.

Yeah, Muslim only quoted posts that he was directly related to which was a stupid idea, but at the same time it doesn't take a good long read through his posts (which was linked in the OP) to figure out that Malleo isn't really all that intelligent. Again, since this isn't a drama about a personal conflict between Muslim and Malleo I'm not sure how who started it is actually relevant.

If Malleo is an idiot apart from that, cool, i've never denied that.
But your post certainly wasn't constructive towards what the drama was trying to achieve.

I'm not sure how who started it is actually relevant.
...

So if I go around flaming people and fishing for reactions, and then post a drama thread on people who react, you don't think I should be judged based on my actions leading up to the drama thread?

Or is this just another one of those things that should only happen when you personally don't like the person in subject

Only 3 of the 8 quotes listed could be taken as 'fishing for a reaction', I think he was just calling him out for being an idiot and when he continued to forget around he made the drama topic. I highly doubt he just randomly targeted Malleo for baiting.

Earlier in this topic you said you were calling him an idiot for being an idiot, and now you're saying you were calling him an idiot for fishing for reactions to drama him.


Earlier in this topic you said you were calling him an idiot for being an idiot, and now you're saying you were calling him an idiot for fishing for reactions to drama him.
are you seriously implying that's somehow inconsistent? I went from generally calling him an idiot into the specifics of why I think his behaviour was idiotic, that's pretty basic dude.

i've made my point blatantly clear. the current drama standards support what i'm saying. if you can't cope with people judging the OP based on their behaviour leading up to the drama, you should just keep your tears to yourself. Your current whims are not compatible with the climate of drama.