Author Topic: Homoloveuality! Let's discuss.  (Read 16749 times)

"lol I'm right and you're wrong!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_loveual_orientation#Chromosome_linkage_studies
Wikipedia! Yeah, that'll show me!

Seriously, choose another source that isn't written by the majority of people who are biased and/or have no degree at all. Like a University or a licensed health research center or something.

Going to be against my own opinion about We pick who we are based on how we evolve Mentally, Morally, and how we use our curiosity to become better or worse people, Just a few seconds, if genetics WAS the actual reason why people have oddball loveuality.

you do know that genetics play a huge part in how the womb creates the person. I mean. It's a mixture between 50% sperm and %50 egg, Right? Then it changes based on the genetic Data and random selection. Which Does mean that genetics Do run all that in the womb.

If I am wrong, Once again, Please be somewhat Nice, and tell me where I am wrong.
If genetics were responsible for the loveual orientation of a person; everyone would either be (good majority of) heteroloveuals and (very few) biloveuals. Natural selection would be in favor of those who were able to pass on the loveual orientation gene.
However it doesn't work like that. Homoloveuality and Biloveuality has been around since the dawn of mankind and even animals.

And if a person chose their loveuality, they would've woke up someday and said to themselves "Hmm, maybe I'll go about my life sticking it in my own gender" or "Hmm, maybe I'll go stick it in a girl's vagoo." or both. People confuse with choosing your orientation and discovering your orientation. When you "choose" your loveual orientation; you actually discover that you have that orientation and that you've had it ever since you were nothing but a small bit of organic matter. You just never knew until now.

Because I know myself more than anyone else, and nowhere in my entire life do I ever recall that stopped to think to myself, "Hey, I'm going to be a person that likes to have loveual relationships & loveual contact with women for the rest of my life," and suddenly become a heteroloveual.

And if a person chose their loveuality, they would've woke up someday and said to themselves "Hmm, maybe I'll go about my life sticking it in my own gender" or "Hmm, maybe I'll go stick it in a girl's vagoo." or both. People confuse with choosing your orientation and discovering your orientation. When you "choose" your loveual orientation; you actually discover that you have that orientation and that you've had it ever since you were nothing but a small bit of organic matter. You just never knew until now.

That sounds about right

I had crushes on girls in elementary through middle school and then suddenly i was like wow okay vaginas are weird

Has anyone posted the "why don't we have both?" image in here yet?

Wikipedia! Yeah, that'll show me!

Seriously, choose another source that isn't written by the majority of people who are biased and/or have no degree at all. Like a University or a licensed health research center or something.
You must not know what"references" or "citations" are.

Has anyone posted the "why don't we have both?" image in here yet?

I should have done that, I want both. :(

Has anyone posted the "why don't we have both?" image in here yet?

I should, considering I find Both lovees Hot. But I wont, It'll be typical, I'm not much of a MeMe user.

Wikipedia! Yeah, that'll show me!

Seriously, choose another source that isn't written by the majority of people who are biased and/or have no degree at all. Like a University or a licensed health research center or something.
>2013
>still believing Wikipedia isn't a reliable source

>2013
>still believing Wikipedia isn't a reliable source

I think it's the teacher's still giving people BS nonsense about it not being reliable, I'm sure Wikipedia has A pretty damn strict editing system/Rules.

I like Oasis' point the best; if it's not hurting anybody, why does it matter?

because it's hurting their own personal relationship with our lord and savior jesus christ

Wikipedia! Yeah, that'll show me!

Seriously, choose another source that isn't written by the majority of people who are biased and/or have no degree at all. Like a University or a licensed health research center or something.
okay
just because it's linked to a wikipedia article doesn't mean it's wrong, lol. it even had a sciencemag article linked as a source for that information.

because it's hurting their own personal relationship with our lord and savior jesus christ

hail satan

You must not know what"references" or "citations" are.
Where should I begin Capt'n?


>2013
>still believing Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
>greentext
>blockland forums

Because Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. But if I want to get some basic idea on a subject; I'll happily use it.

EDIT:

okay
just because it's linked to a wikipedia article doesn't mean it's wrong, lol. it even had a sciencemag article linked as a source for that information.
Thanks. I'll have a good read at these, they look very reliable.



loving mongoloid
No, keep your way2cool greentext inside the imageboards where they belong.