Seems you're a bit angry about this whole situation about Night Fox not liking your games. Well to be frank I've never thought that old video games were necessarily good compared to new games. I'll dissect my point here. And yes I realize this is on page 2. And yes I realize this probably outdated. But I'm going to post this for the truth it is anyways.
Point AJust because games are old does not make them good. I am not going to imply or imply to imply that you are thinking that or saying that; but I'm going to iterate it again just for the sake of saying it. Just because a game is old does not make it in any way superior to modern games. This is probably the most broad point you can get across relative to this subject or viewpoint.
Point BAdmit it - graphics do have an impact on gameplay. As much as you want to ignore it or call my point out for its stupidity, graphics do have an impact. Are you seriously going to buy a game - no matter the premise or gameplay - if it has stuffty, oh-god-why graphics? No, you're not, so why would you even try to argue that you are?
Point CProbably the final point I'll type tonight, will add more later - Old games lack. Yes. It's true. You like to say it's not, but it's true. Games like Doom lacked in gameplay and didn't make up for it in graphics or design. Doom was pretty much a stereotypical shooter. Maybe one with a different, almost odd POV, but yes, it was about as dynamic as your newest COD game.
