Author Topic: Speedy_Onion2 - what the forget  (Read 6652 times)

As I stated before, I have paid to be here and will conduct myself in a manner that I see fit.
Meaning - I will bump any thread I wish to bump because I have paid for that right.
Holy stuff you're condescending
Like, can you step off your high horse and act like you aren't the specialist flower in the garden

Also by the way, all of us paid for the game and by extension the website so you really aren't flaunting yourself by saying you paid for it.

As I stated before, I have paid to be here and will conduct myself in a manner that I see fit.
Meaning - I will bump any thread I wish to bump because I have paid for that right.
and we have paid for the right to dislike you and consider you a child that shouldn't be here


As I stated before, I have paid to be here and will conduct myself in a manner that I see fit.
Meaning - I will bump any thread I wish to bump because I have paid for that right.


Except that right can be taken away if you continue conducting yourself in this manner.
This is completely incorrect. Bumping topics is not against the rules what so ever! Neither is speedy's right to post as he pleases.
Holy stuff you're condescending
Like, can you step off your high horse and act like you aren't the specialist flower in the garden

Also by the way, all of us paid for the game and by extension the website so you really aren't flaunting yourself by saying you paid for it.
Actually my friend, you are the condescending individual here. You're the one who put him down for using his rightful privileges.
With this logic you will get banned in no time
Him stating his beliefs in this manner is no way against the rules.

He is exactly right, he paid for this privilege and he can post as he pleases. Unless of course he is breaking the rules which he has not done in any way, shape, or form.

This is completely incorrect. Bumping topics is not against the rules what so ever! Neither is speedy's right to post as he pleases.
Except many people have been banned for bumping old topics

Yes, bumping isn't wrong, it isn't bannable, but at the least bumping is good when the topic is worth it and you have something to input.
:cookie:
*Requoting someone elses opinion* (This is a pet peeve of mine because you should contribute something at the least I don't need to reread something because you share the same opinion, add more to it!)
Never.
Wasn't that insightful and enlightening? No, and you shouldn't bump if it's not with the intention of sparking more conversation because it clogs up the more recent posts from being seen. You've been here for a supposed 5 years or so. This isn't just for drama, it's for any board, it should be common sense that the reason why you have rights is to use them rightly.

With this logic you will get banned in no time

Because it states clearly in the rules that bumping old threads isn't allowed?

Because it states clearly in the rules that bumping old threads isn't allowed?
can we agree on both bloukface being wrong and you having brainy brain problems

can we agree on both bloukface being wrong and you having brainy brain problems
Why the heck are you such an ass to people. Have some respect dude...

With this logic you will get banned in no time
He's been banned once before, hence the two at the end of his name
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=201804.msg5559165#msg5559165

Holy stuff you're condescending
Like, can you step off your high horse and act like you aren't the specialist flower in the garden

Also by the way, all of us paid for the game and by extension the website so you really aren't flaunting yourself by saying you paid for it.

Didn't mean to flaunt - Only to state a fact. I do have a right to conduct myself as I please! That is a fact that will remain undisputed. I paid for that right like everyone else. You have a right to do as you see fit with your privileges, so long as they do not break the rules. As I also paid for the right to post in these forums, I have that right, as well.
My remarks were not meant to condescend, and I apologize for the negative sentiment you thought was intended.

can we agree on both bloukface being wrong and you having brainy brain problems

I don't see a need to reply here as I regard this comment as dismissive and silly.
However, I will so that you may know I am not here to resolve anything.
I am not here to point fingers as to who is suffering from "brainy brain problems".
I'm simply defending myself and will continue to do so.

I don't see a need to reply here as I regard this comment as dismissive and silly.
However, I will so that you may know I am not here to resolve anything.
I am not here to point fingers as to who is suffering from "brainy brain problems".
I'm simply defending myself and will continue to do so.
this is the most contradictive statement ever
for one it is a reply and you are not dismissing it as you are, surprise, replying to it
if you're not here to resolve anything then why are you defending yourself
defending yourself leads to an eventual resolve, positive or negative matter not
if you were to truly defend yourself you wouldn't have posted anything in the first place
you are pointing not to others directly, but you are saying you are the rational one
your rights are rightly so disproportional to the reasons that you continue to illicit as an excuse! if you feel like you don't care about any of the input, shrugging it off, then you shouldn't have posted in the first place.

Yes, bumping isn't wrong, it isn't bannable, but at the least bumping is good when the topic is worth it and you have something to input.Wasn't that insightful and enlightening? No, and you shouldn't bump if it's not with the intention of sparking more conversation because it clogs up the more recent posts from being seen. You've been here for a supposed 5 years or so. This isn't just for drama, it's for any board, it should be common sense that the reason why you have rights is to use them rightly.

An intelligible comment - I thank you for it.
However, I disagree with your statement for two reasons.

First, you assume that my intention was not to incite commentary in some form and draw attention to those topics.
It is both obvious and factual that I did so. Please do not presume to label anyone's actions with an intention (or lack thereof) here or anywhere else.

Second, I disagree with your statement about rights and the use of the latter.
Rights, though they are generally bordered by blurry lines, are what they are - Rights. You have the right here, assuming you are not violating the rules, to conduct yourself as you please.
You exercised a right by clicking on the topic and posting a reply.
You did not need to, and some would say it was not "right" but you did it regardless of the judgments others may have made.
it is not up to you or anyone to label an action as "right". There are rules in place, and if an action taken by any individual violates these rules, that is another matter entirely.
However, as I have neither violated a rule nor harmed you in any way, I would say it was foolish for you to busy yourself here. But again, it is not for me to say. Your right is what it is and I have no say on how you should use it. Please offer me the same respect.

Moving on to your second response -

I would like to point out that contradictive is not a word.
You had the right to use the correct word (contradictory) and you did not use it rightly.

I did not say that I was dismissing the comment.
You may have a different ideal in your head as to the perfect self-defense.
I do not see defense as a means to an end - Rather, as a means for survival.
I am not here to end this, only to defend my actions, and my intentions.
I do not intend to solve a problem here.

I also have not stated that I do not care for any of the input from other users.
You've labeled me as apathetic towards others and, whatever else I may be - I do not have an attitude of apathy.

Now, if you see defense of oneself as a means to an end - End it here!