| Blockland Forums > Suggestions & Requests |
| Votekick that bans the instigator when it fails? |
| (1/4) > >> |
| tber123:
Would it be possible for Votekick to backfire and ban the instigator if it fails? I remember playing on Ibans Afganistan DM way back before v20(I remember it was V13-V16), and the votekick would ban the instigator instead if it failed. EDIT:On second thought, it shouldn't be the first time, it should be multiple votekicks failed, or based on how badly it fails, maybe even both. *Blockhead123456 starts a votekick after the last one fails, majority vote no* *Votekick fails* *Ban* --- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on January 22, 2014, 02:31:10 PM ---It would be more sensible to ban the instigator if he/she started multiple votekicks that fail in a variable time frame, not at the first time a votekick fails. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Chrono on January 22, 2014, 04:09:45 PM ---It should also depend on how badly it fails. Or replace votekick with either: -A gamemode/build that doesn't require babysitting. -Competent admins. --- End quote --- |
| TristanLuigi:
This would be really annoying; I could understand a kick but trying to votekick and getting banned for it is way too much. |
| Subpixel:
CONSOLE permanently banned Blockhead123456 (ID: 123456) - "Trying to enforce the rules." |
| Reinforcements:
I kinda like that. People would only do it if the person really needed to be banned, not just vote kicking because they have a vendetta against them. It would have to fail pretty miserable to ban the original voter though. Like 80% no's. (If it just fails naturally because of a lack of yes's, then the caller is ok) |
| phflack:
so basically you want servers to vote on somebody's ego? when somebody vote kicks somebody else, it's pretty much just a vote of one or the other instead of just letting it serve it's purpose, as people would vote to kick even if they're not breaking rules if it's a popular person starting the kick |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |