Pewdipie - Actually hacking blockland

[plad101]

No, he can still. Hand out the hack, he has already did so.

No i'm saying people already know he has it and he was banned on the forums for owning it.

[Ad Bot]

[Scar. z]

He does not need the fourms to give the hack.

[plad101]

He does not need the fourms to give the hack.

you aren't getting what i'm saying people already know he has it and he can be giving it out.

[Scar. z]

Oh

[Scar. z]

I highly suggest Badspot find where this source is coming from, because even if his key is revoked, he won't stop.

[plad101]

He really can't stop them from giving it out unless he rats them and deletes the files.

[RagnaTheBroedge]

then the next day he hacked me.

um
the number of things this can potentially imply makes this statement pretty meaningless

[ßlöükfáce]

In that case, how does the numerity of wifi hotspots equal the demise of dial-up?
That's not very logical.

Time to get off the internet, moron.

That means dial up is for dinosaurs

[Sylvanor]

i heard about BLhack1, but i also heard about a v2 ??

[Advanced Bot]

.dll injection associates the .dll with the executable (by injecting it into its process), therefore it becomes part of the blockland process. By your TOS definition he's inside the bounds of the TOS.

Just stop posting. Just admit you don't have a real brain.

[RagnaTheBroedge]

he's banned lol

[Advanced Bot]

he's banned lol

Good.

[$trinick]

Lol this one is old. To use it you have to inject a dll. However, I would never trust anyone that is 'sharing' the hack. He could easily include code to steal your key or an actual virus.

Congratulations, this is called fear mongering. The only people who have anywhere near enough skill at reversing to do this (not to mention they'd have to reverse the actual DLL too, the source code is private) have already proven that they have no intention of actually attacking users computers.

[Blockzillahead]

he's banned lol

thank loving lord

[Zeblote]

Congratulations, this is called fear mongering. The only people who have anywhere near enough skill at reversing to do this (not to mention they'd have to reverse the actual DLL too, the source code is private) have already proven that they have no intention of actually attacking users computers.

What? Nononono. I mean those people that find a copy of it somewhere or got it from someone else and then give it to everyone they know. They could easily take malicios code, and name that blhack.dll