Matthew's Programs (pwGen, v1.10 (can save now))

[Matthew Padilla]

MCUP

Password Generator:

v 1.10 can be downloaded here

Things to do:

• Add encryption to the passwords.
• Add a save feature.

ChangeLog:

• v 1.0 - 1.01 ~ Fixed input closing program, decreased file size.
• v 1.01 - 1.02 ~ Various bug fixes.
• v 1.02 - 1.10 ~ Added save features.
• v 1.10 - 1.15 ~ COMING SOON

Pics (cause pics or no clix):



How to use:

To save you have to say Yes when it asks you if you want to. It saves the password in genPW.txt in the directory of the .exe


COMING SOON:

Encryptor
Write
Schedule

All of these are made in C++

[Ad Bot]

[0xBRIANSMITH]

You can't post direct links to exes without source code.

[Matthew Padilla]

You can't post direct links to exes without source code.

Where is this rule?

Go download it for yourself I bet you a hundred it isnt bad.

[PurpleMetro]

or you could just post a virus total scan, that's still a safe way right?
well, if every virus scanner didn't mark every unknown .exe as bad

[Matthew Padilla]

or you could just post a virus total scan, that's still a safe way right?
well, if every virus scanner didn't mark every unknown .exe as bad

there you go, https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b0318d7e2fa49cd6610c24b5ffd6b1109748908dcb83eea6e835413f7d6136df/brown townysis/1391747725/

[0xBRIANSMITH]

3 antiviruses detected it
I suggest removing it and providing source for people to build.

[Matthew Padilla]

3 antiviruses detected it
I suggest removing it and providing source for people to build.

lol yea and ever heard of a false positive? McAfee says it is virus free, but then the GW Edition of McAfee says it isnt virus free. Obviously stuffty antivirus is stuffty. Every known antivirus said it is clean.

[0xBRIANSMITH]

lol yea and ever heard of a false positive? McAfee says it is virus free, but then the GW Edition of McAfee says it isnt virus free. Obviously stuffty antivirus is stuffty. Every known antivirus said it is clean.

I don't see the problem with providing source.
It allows people to give constructive criticism of your code.

[Matthew Padilla]

I don't see the problem with providing source.
It allows people to give constructive criticism of your code.

First of all, I made it, I don't want to give out the code especially not to you. Second of all I really don't want someone to look over something I made and posted on the internet and tell me what is bad about it.

Everything you have said so far is about getting other peoples work and then taking a dump on them about how bad it is. Source Code, Source Code, Source Code. WOPE, false positive, better post the source code.

https://community.mcafee.com/thread/51733
https://community.mcafee.com/thread/6841
https://community.mcafee.com/thread/50012

[Conan]

how about brian promises not to go all critique-y over it and you'll do what he asks? either way, iirc posting .exe's can be bannable.

and honestly I don't see why you don't want criticism (excepting formatting) since its basically the one most effective way to improve? but whatever floats your boat...

[Decepticon]

Matthew's actually kinda right, Brian. Whenever I used Virustotal with the installer of SA-MP (San Andreas Multiplayer) and GTA MP (or something like that), for both of them it detected 3 or 2 things.

[Mariofan1701]

taking a dump on them

I don't see the problem with providing source.
It allows people to give constructive criticism of your code.

[Matthew Padilla]

First of all, I made it, I don't want to give out the code especially not to you.

you, referring to Brian

[Matthew Padilla]

Updated to version 1.01, cutting the file size in half and fixing input crashes.

[0xBRIANSMITH]

First of all, I made it, I don't want to give out the code especially not to you. Second of all I really don't want someone to look over something I made and posted on the internet and tell me what is bad about it.

so you want to stay bad forever and never improve?
well jee ok.