Author Topic: LGBTQA megathread- the stuffstorm has passed and a rainbow protrudes the clouds.  (Read 36117 times)

Why no be yourself and just do what you do rather than define yourself as a title? There is no need to make things complicated. Sometimes it better to be vague or have a lack of adjectives. Like if one wanted to describe the temperature would say it is hot outside or hellishly hot, no wait it is freaking hot because it is not quite hot as hot or hot as hellishly hot.

Basically if you don't want to complicate things then all you need are few different shades of grey or a few select colors of a rainbow rather than several variant of colors to describe each niche.
I can see where you are coming from, but there is need to distinguish these loveualities- there is no thin line between them.

Why no be yourself and just do what you do rather than define yourself as a title? There is no need to make things complicated. Sometimes it better to be vague or have a lack of adjectives. Like if one wanted to describe the temperature would say it is hot outside or hellishly hot, no wait it is freaking hot because it is not quite hot as hot or hot as hellishly hot.

Basically if you don't want to complicate things then all you need are few different shades of grey or a few select colors of a rainbow rather than several variant of colors to describe each niche.

I'm not saying we need these super long obnoxious "demistuffstainlolthisjokeisdu mbasforgetloveual" titles. Those sound sort of ridiculous to me.

You said yourself to use a few different shades of color to describe ourselves, and that's exactly what heteroloveual, homoloveual, biloveual, aloveual, and transgender/tranloveual do. Those are the only terms I honestly recognize as legit because, surprise surprise, the psychological and biological communities do too.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2014, 09:40:21 PM by Mega-Bear »

I think interlove is pretty legitimate, alas, considered a minority.

add me, my loveuality is Xenoloveual.

add me, my loveuality is Xenoloveual.

Real talk for a second here though. In the future, when we make contact with aliens or whatever, I think it's safe to bet xenoloveuals will actually be a thing.

Real talk for a second here though. In the future, when we make contact with aliens or whatever, I think it's safe to bet xenoloveuals will actually be a thing.
who said they weren't already~

add me, my loveuality is Xenoloveual.
Do you just... find aliens loveually/romantically attractive?

Silreath, you notice LGBT people are actually considered a minority, right?

It is like you are saying a minority has a minority in it, if that even makes sense. The said minority would technically be at a same level of minority-ness than LGBT people.

Silreath, you notice LGBT people are actually considered a minority, right?

It is like you are saying a minority has a minority in it, if that even makes sense. The said minority would technically be at a same level of minority-ness than LGBT people.
It's minorities within minorities within minorities, it's inception!
Hell, I don't think you can get much more minor than OP is right now.

Do you just... find aliens loveually/romantically attractive?
she prefers to be called by her Botanical name, but yeah.

Silreath, you notice LGBT people are actually considered a minority, right?

It is like you are saying a minority has a minority in it, if that even makes sense. The said minority would technically be at a same level of minority-ness than LGBT people.
Also you can add as many different colors and shades, but in the end it all mixes to black.

she prefers to be called by her Botanical name, but yeah.
Uhh... care to explain?

Also you can add as many different colors and shades, but in the end it all mixes to black.
holy stuff you loving tribal

I think the thing that bothers me about panloveuality is that it implies biloveuals are not attracted to transmen or transwoman, considering thats the only thing that differs panloveuality from biloveuality
well technically that's what biloveuality is
it's just that most people mean pan when they say bi
of course it doesn't really matter
like, obviously if you're heteroloveual you shouldn't say you're gay. that would be stupid. but you don't have to be 100% conforming to whatever label you wanna use. like I generally just tell people I'm gay because for the most part I am, but I'm attracted to girls sometimes too. it's just simpler. plus it avoids the dumb hate bi people seem to get from some gay people for whatever reason
« Last Edit: March 08, 2014, 10:10:54 PM by Night Fox »

well technically that's what biloveuality is
it's just that most people mean pan when they say bi
Right. Theres a difference between Bi and Pan, and it annoys me when people mix the two up..