Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

[Zeblote]

Let me retort with this: Nobody that has gone out of their way to distribute blhack thus far has been intelligent enough to make a version that steals your blockland key.

How can you be sure?

[Ad Bot]

[AdinX]

Because there isn't a bunch of reports of people losing their keys, and I imagine at some point someone who has BLHack.dll has looked over the code for it to check for any backdoor scripting.

[Ipquarx]

Plus; blockland keys are practically worthless when you can do any number of nasty things with injected dlls.

[Evar678]

Quick question; has anybody mentioned that aimbots exist in client-sided add-on form?

[blockman01]

How many more people I know are gonna fall apart?

[Candy Apple]

Damn is all I can really say here, sad to see

[Blake1]

I'd like to apologize to the community for my recent actions. I've been a major starfish lately and I hope I can make things right. I've been really stressed out lately on things in real life and I let that affect how I treated others in game and in real life. Now, I'm not saying this is an excuse for my actions, I admit to being a major idiot to Cca. I approached Cca the wrong way and started the argument myself, I take all the blame for doing so. Once again, I'm very sorry to both Cca and the community, and I do hope we can put this behind and move forward.

[$trinick]

I get this was posted like 10 pages ago, but..

Whether he used it to kill people or not isn't the issue, the issue is that he used it in the first place.

I don't see how you can possibly have this logic about anything. What does it matter if he used it if he didn't use it for any dishonest purposes? There's no such thing as an item that is only bad in utility-- even nuclear weapons have been adapted into amazing energy sources-- so why be so adamant that any use of it at all is a bad thing?

It's against the rules to use BLHack to cheat. There's no precedence for using it for not cheating. I've programmed several blockland "hacks" in C++ that were not malicious at all-- they simply used the same injection mechanism as BLHack. I've implemented a terrain generator into the source code for ultra-high-performance terrain generation at scale, I've implemented JavaScript scripting within Blockland itself, and I've made numerous other small projects that operate on the same technology as a back end that BLHack uses. Are you going to say I should be banned for 'hacking' too?

[Ipquarx]

Well, according to the EULA, that means that baddy can ban/revoke you because of it. I'm not saying you should be banned but you could be banned.

[$trinick]

Well, according to the EULA, that means that baddy can ban/revoke you because of it. I'm not saying you should be banned but you could be banned.

Should was the operative word. I picked it specifically.

[Zeblote]

Well, according to the EULA, that means that baddy can ban/revoke you because of it.

According to the EULA your license can be terminated at any time without reason so that doesn't really matter.

[Aduioa]

According to the EULA your license can be terminated at any time without reason so that doesn't really matter.

Wow. Don't piss Badspot off.

[AdinX]

According to the EULA your license can be terminated at any time without reason so that doesn't really matter.

This specific quote frightens me. If there is one thing I fear most when posting, it was this part of the EULA. There is no nice way to say it other than "if I just don't like you, tough stuff."

Mr. Hartman has power where there is chaos

Wow. Don't piss Badspot off.

that's basically the TL;DR of what I was about to post :I

[King of the Bill]

This specific quote frightens me. If there is one thing I fear most when posting, it was this part of the EULA. There is no nice way to say it other than "if I just don't like you, tough stuff."

Mr. Hartman has power where there is chaosthat's basically the TL;DR of what I was about to post :I

He usually doesn't do it unless a convenient reason comes up.
If he was already mad at Zapk, Zapk may very well have been revoked for this.

[Aide33]

Quick question; has anybody mentioned that aimbots exist in client-sided add-on form?

no