Author Topic: 12 Year Old Gives Birth  (Read 2309 times)

12 year olds kind of have the responsibility of school as well though
And an 18 yearold doesn't? University is a school too.

Adults kind of have the responsibility of jobs though.
And this.

how can a 12 y/o be loose enough to pop out a kid is the real question.

how can a 12 y/o be loose enough to pop out a kid is the real question.
They cut the sides of the vagina to give it a higher ability to stretch without the mother tearing a muscle. Or atleast that's the intention. Sometimes, they tear anyways.


12 year olds are not mature enough to be parents. it might have happened a long time ago, but that doesn't mean it's right.
Back then they were probably more mature than the crap we crank out today  :cookieMonster:
« Last Edit: April 17, 2014, 01:07:33 PM by Lockebox »



Children in China (and Asia generally) aged 11-13 give birth too.

It's not child enthusiast if both are the same age. And it isn't rape if both parties are OK with it.
They're under the age of consent.
By law they're not old enough to consent to loveual acts, even if they want to.
The girl was 11 when she had love with a 12 year old. That 11 year old girl was not old enough to give consent.
The 12 year old boy, being older, was committing rape.


And the fact that the parents of these children weren't able to stop this is the true problem.
If you've brought your child up to be loveually active that young then there's a big problem with your parenting. End of.

Maybe it's not a surprise though, seeing as how the Mother of the girl was only 14/15 herself when she gave birth.

does anyone have pics of her before birth?

think about this:

12 year olds are annoying

mothers are annoyiong

by the transitive property, 12 year old mothers would be deathcon zeta annoying


think about this:

12 year olds are annoying

mothers are annoyiong

by the transitive property, 12 year old mothers would be deathcon zeta annoying

babies are annoying too
better multiply it by two

What? People in the medieval era got married at 10 years of age. And in rural parts of countries, people have love at the age of 11-13.
1. medieval era =/= now
2. life expectancy is much larger now then it was back then, small pox were also a problem. The only reason for us to exist is to reproduce and survive, that's how nature works. The life expectancy was low then, so younger people needed to reproduce. That is most likely why 11-13 yr. olds had babies then

1. medieval era =/= now
2. life expectancy is much larger now then it was back then, small pox were also a problem. The only reason for us to be living is to reproduce and survive, that's how nature works. The life expectancy was low then, so younger people needed to reproduce. That is most likely why 11-13 yr. olds had babies then
Also bear in mind that back in those times it was 11-16 year old having children with men in their 20-30s.

And it was a cultural thing for girls to have children young.
Girls were basically worthless, being less efficient as builders or farmers and therefore fathers would want to sell them off.
Girls are only useful when they're having children, so you want to sell them when they can do that.
Girls start puberty several years before boys so you sell them then, once they've had their first period. That means around the ages of 10-14.


It was as much a social thing as it was a necessary thing.
And society has changed now and it's no longer acceptable for children to have babies so young, nor to have love, with someone older OR the same age as them. It's not something to promote or even condone.

It's not child enthusiast if both are the same age. And it isn't rape if both parties are OK with it.
pretty much this