Author Topic: Insidious - Swholloween [Movie Review]  (Read 7517 times)

Your lime johntron but mostly for movies
Uhg, guys, let me know when Youtube decides to stop being a richard and the copyright strike claim is removed (I've already disputed it, the flag was instantaneous now, they're on to me).
Wow some people cant handle criticism

Your lime johntron but mostly for movies

I'm thinking of perhaps doing a game in the future, but it'd be in a different format.

Obviously I still have that old channel I did game reviews on as well. I have those videos put into a playlist on my main channel.

You look like Markiplier in the main pic for some reason.


you have talent with this style

I could totally see you as a multi 100k subscriber or more youtuber someday if you keep this up

swholli what do i need to do to gain your favor so you can mention me in your youtube award acceptance speech

Yes, I love these reviews. Keep up the good work.


this was amusing

horror is good
horror movies these days really aren't

Oh no.

Guys I just watched Free Birds and...

I don't think I'll be able to wait until Thanksgiving.

this was cool liked amd subscribed

Strangely these were the two horror movies I actually enjoyed.

I won't lie.

Insidious 1 wasn't as bad as I said in the video. The complaints were nitpicks mostly, though really the whole thing was ruined for me in the third act with the Tiny Tim stuff.

But Insidious 2? What a mess. That movie took all the boring parts of the first but then didn't have anything redeemable about it. It just threw out so many ideas and tropes and then had so little I cared about combined with one of the most confusing plots I've seen, and you've got a really stuffty movie.

I don't think Insidious was worth there being a sequel, let alone a third one on its way next year.

I won't lie.

Insidious 1 wasn't as bad as I said in the video. The complaints were nitpicks mostly, though really the whole thing was ruined for me in the third act with the Tiny Tim stuff.

But Insidious 2? What a mess. That movie took all the boring parts of the first but then didn't have anything redeemable about it. It just threw out so many ideas and tropes and then had so little I cared about combined with one of the most confusing plots I've seen, and you've got a really stuffty movie.

I don't think Insidious was worth there being a sequel, let alone a third one on its way next year.
I can somewhat agree on Insidious 2 being a bit dull compared to the first; the plot is still quite interesting (at least I thought so, which is probably why I enjoyed it) but as far as being a movie critic goes, the movie was pretty much the exact same as the first one with less scares and a pretty predictable storyline. There was one bit that I can only remember thinking "wow, what an anti climax."
I should probably remember it seeing as I just saw the movie earlier today.. but I've a #goldfishmemory.



Holy stuff.

The WMG decided they didn't like my disputed claim of the information and works being presented here as commentary and critique and that it didn't fall under fair use.

I don’t even know what I’m supposed to say to that. The song was included in the movie. The movie payed their licensing fees to have the song appear in the film, and as such the song is now just as much a part of the movie as the rest of it is and is therefor subject to criticism (thus making it fair use).

Oh also, the clip in question is roughly 33 seconds in length, some of that has the song edited to sound muffled from behind a window.

Jesus.

Edit: oh, be warned, if I lose the dispute and the copyright holder gets the claim reinstated, the video in question will most likely be removed. So if you suddenly can't find it one day, that's why.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2014, 12:13:55 PM by Swholli »