Author Topic: Furling's Good Point of the religious.  (Read 3294 times)

I am compelled to make the religious.

please not make the religious

This thread is giving me a headache

Furling is the forums equivalent of Jar-Jar.

Furling is the forums equivalent of Jar-Jar.

MESA FOUND FUNNY MEMES ON NEWS

iirc religious debates are against the rules (unwritten)
No, they're perfectly allowed. It's just that if it turns into a bunch of deliberate trolling and flaming badspot might step in and like, move it to drama.


I mean if the furry megathread is allowed, why not this?


furling has gone athiest

the flying spaghetti monster wishes to touch you with its noodly appendage

I was going to say "oh boy another religion argument coming this way" but honestly, I have no idea what this thread is even about.

w-wait hold on

"I am not involed in any religious. I perfer follow GOD's way without religious."

You just said you're nonreligious, and that you prefer to follow god's way. WITHOUT religion.

God is a religious thing.

furling what are you even doing anymore
I'm just confused now.



God is a religious thing.
Does GOD create the religious?, you tell to me.

Does GOD create the religious?, you tell to me.

furling i have no idea what the forget you're talking about.

Does GOD create the religious?, you tell to me.

The real question is:

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

...If I can understand Furling's point, he's trying to argue that humans shape religion? And that they set the standards and guidelines?

Well if that's your argument, aren't religious standards set by people most of the time influenced by the Bible, which is supposedly God's word? Yeah, argument refuted.