Author Topic: ALS foundation admits 73% of donations were not used for research.  (Read 4920 times)


cus they read this article


most of these adverts seem pretty stupid. This might be a satire site or something
« Last Edit: August 29, 2014, 01:21:33 PM by Tayasaurus »

assuming this is true...

absolutely everyone just boarded the ruse cruise

and the ruse cruise turned out to be the titanic  :cookieMonster:

assuming this is true...

absolutely everyone just boarded the ruse cruise

and the ruse cruise turned out to be the titanic  :cookieMonster:
being dunked into ice-cold water in the summer?


Its not like they used ths 73% to buy Lamborghinis and hookers

I will still donate.

Its not like they used ths 73% to buy Lamborghinis and hookers

I will still donate.

Jane H. Gilbert – President and CEO –$339,475.00

i duno mang, she cold've gotten 339,475 $1 male hookers

Jane H. Gilbert – President and CEO –$339,475.00

i duno mang, she cold've gotten 339,475 $1 male hookers
orge

 wish I made that much money.

Jane H. Gilbert – President and CEO –$339,475.00

i duno mang, she cold've gotten 339,475 $1 male hookers
Wow, that's 4,000 kids donations wasted on her lol

Wow, that's 4,000 kids donations wasted on her lol
asuming they all donated 75 dollars

... research is not the only ALS related problem. more than 90% of the money helps people in some way. Even if it's only 27%, that's still millions of dollars they wouldn't have gotten otherwise.

On Belgian news they said that they were overwhelmed by how much money they've received and don't know what to do with it.

On Belgian news they said that they were overwhelmed by how much money they've received and don't know what to do with it.
buy more lab equipment and scientists Instead of giving your ceo 339k

Its clearly an satirical site they sell ear covers with obama's face on them I mean come on.

Even if it's only 27%, that's still millions of dollars they wouldn't have gotten otherwise.
Saying you're going to donate money you get to charity and then keeping roughly three fourths of it isn't moral, even if it's money they "wouldn't have gotten otherwise".

Saying you're going to donate money you get to charity and then keeping roughly three fourths of it isn't moral, even if it's money they "wouldn't have gotten otherwise".

They're not keeping 3/4ths of it you ignoramus.