Author Topic: "See Anita Sarkeesian Tonight On The Colbert Report" - 11:30 EST - SOON  (Read 4345 times)

well, the fact that gawker released multiple articles saying that "everyone is tired of gamergate" and "they should just stop" because "they're losing millions." like. good. im glad. good.

...and Adrien Chen, a former top Gawker journalist, wrote a NASTY piece on cripplemoot, writing that he's "only a torso perched on an electric wheelchair" with "deformed bones [and] shriveled legs".
https://archive.today/FpKkn
I'll go over the rest of what you posted at some other point, but the actual article reads:
Quote
Another dancer watched the celebration in amazement. “He’s only one year old?” she exclaimed, pointing to Brennan. Brennan does physically resemble a child, if not an infant. He was born with osteogenesis imperfecta, a disorder characterized by brittle and deformed bones. He has a startlingly tiny body and a high-pitched voice. At first glance, you see only a torso perched on an electric wheelchair, since his shriveled legs rest tucked underneath his body. But as the sharp features of his normal-size face reveal, he is in fact a 20-year-old man.
If I should expect misinformed or purposefully altered quotes like this from the rest of your evidence that Gawker, a huge company made up of smaller companies run by dozens of people ranging all across the spectrum of respectful and fair writers to people that borderline shouldn't have a job, should be shut down, then please tell me now before I have to sift through all your sources.

I don't doubt that there's some bad writing, I don't doubt that you don't agree with everything every publication prints or publishes, but for the love of god open your mind up to the possibility that the world isn't black and white, and people with different opinions aren't the enemy. You can disagree with people without hating them.

Gawker are SERIOUS bullies...
http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/gawker_bullying.php
Oh my god, Sam Biddle? You're pinning your opinion on a company because of Sam loving Biddle?

The rest of this article has some merit, Gizmodo is mostly the only Gawker site I get news from, and they do realize that the entire company isn't bad. However most cases are pretty weak for saying Gawker is a "bully".

Gawker is being sued because they do not pay their interns.
http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/41201/gawker-is-latest-target-of-unpaid-intern-class-action
Have you never heard of an unpaid internship? They're quite common and only recently have they become a big issue. I don't agree with what Gawker is doing, but I'm sure you'd rather be interning at a great game studio then flipping burgers for a living. On the job experience is fantastic, but I guess only if you have the means to survive while you do it, which clearly some of these interns in the class-action could no longer do.

Gawker listed sponsors that do not actually advertise them, which is a textbook case of fraud.
http://adland.tv/adnews/gawker-toxic-brands-who-partner-them/1291467968
I'd really like a less colored article about this topic, and I'd like to see their sponsor page now, though I can't seem to find it. Regardless, that's pretty serious if it is true, and the topic of Sam Biddle losing them partners is a whole other thing. The fact that that man isn't fired yet astounds me.

Gawker just signed a 15-year lease for a massive new $75 million office in the heart of NYC. Earliest chance to cancel is 2024.
http://www.businessinsider.com/gawkers-new-offices-2014-9
What's the problem here?

Gawker supports child enthusiasm:
https://archive.today/i1Njv
Find me where in that article it says that that writer supports child enthusiasm. I'm interested to know.
Quote
The old adage is that the true mark of a society is how it treats the weakest in its ranks. Blacks, women, Latinos, gays and lesbians, and others are still in no way on wholly equal footing in America. But they're also not nearly as lowly and cursed as men attracted to children. One imagines that if Jesus ever came to Earth, he'd embrace the poor, the blind, the lepers, and, yes, the child enthusiasts. As a self-professed "progressive," when I think of the world I'd like to live in, I like to imagine that one day I'd be OK with a man like Terry moving next door to me and my children. I like to think that I could welcome him in for dinner, break bread with him, and offer him the same blessings he's offered me time and again. And what hurts to admit, even knowing all I know now, is that I'm not positive I could do that.
I'd like to think that you just got all these links from some other poor misinformed person, who apparently is dispensing this "evidence" that Gawker is an evil company with some end goal in mind that the entire company will go down in flames.

I just went through all of it, and the only problems with Gawker, as a media parent company, a company that basically manages smaller companies, the only problem I can see is Sam Biddle's tweets. That's it. Next.


« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 11:54:06 PM by Oasis »

Oh my god, Sam Biddle? You're pinning your opinion on a company because of Sam loving Biddle?
It's not just biddle, it's the fact that gawker supports biddle.

@Below post: The reporters get paid per click.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 11:46:33 PM by Ipquarx »

also dont click on kotaku articles we need to put them out of their misery by no letting them get any ad money
Every time I click on a Gawker article I feel dirty and pity myself for paying such a disgusting company.
Examples of why:
Have you people never heard of ad blockers or something?

It's not just biddle, it's the fact that gawker supports biddle.
Ah, just got to that. That does astound me, however once again, saying "Gawker" supports Biddle is like saying the U.S. supports capital punishment. Sure the system does, many people within it might, but that shouldn't be used to incriminate the entirety of a group.

Ah, just got to that. That does astound me, however once again, saying "Gawker" supports Biddle is like saying the U.S. supports capital punishment. Sure the system does, many people within it might, but that shouldn't be used to incriminate the entirety of a group.
Gawker supports biddle, advertisers don't support biddle, therefore advertisers pull out of gawker. It makes sense to me. It actually works the same way with your example. the US supports executions, certain medical companies don't support their medicine being used in executions (because that's how executions work now; overdoses on medications), so the medical companies that don't support it don't sell to the US government.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 11:56:50 PM by Ipquarx »

Gawker supports biddle, advertisers don't support biddle, therefore advertisers pull out of gawker. It makes sense to me.
Wow my point just flew right across the top of that head of yours.

Alright, yes, because Sam Biddle wasn't immediately fired, which would have been the smart thing to do, Gawker lost partners. That's not what I was talking about, but sure, we'll go with it.

Why do you think Gawker supports Sam Biddle?

watching this episode and I am pissed

Wow my point just flew right across the top of that head of yours.
I'm not condemning the people within the group, I'm condemning the group itself, which as a whole, has done many many things that I personally take offense to. if that's what you're getting at.

I'm not condemning the people within the group, I'm condemning the group itself, which as a whole, has done many many things that I personally take offense to. if that's what you're getting at.
Condemning groups for the offense of a few is misguided at best, and tragic at worst. A group is nothing more than the people its made up of, so why not direct your anger at Nick Denton who undoubtedly is the source of most of your issues with Gawker.

Anyways, breaking news bulletin:
http://www.businessinsider.com/sam-biddle-is-leaving-valleywag-2014-10

So I guess the reason he wasn't fired is because he insists they were sarcastic tweets, which actually looking at it would fit with his demeanor in other posts. However ill-timed the tweets may have been, I wouldn't crucify the man because of them. It looks like they're moving him to a different department entirely, so maybe we'll hear less from and about him in the future.

Anyways, I'm tired as forget and really enjoyed this actual discussion we tried to have here. Thanks Ipquarx.

I'm not condemning the people within the group, I'm condemning the group itself, which as a whole, has done many many things that I personally take offense to. if that's what you're getting at.
que?

this thread is bascially gamergate 2

Have you people never heard of ad blockers or something?
im pretty sure getting traffic helps keep ads on the website because if there was no traffic all the ads would be pulled

Have you people never heard of ad blockers or something?
I have AdBlock. I block the ads on that site. Still feel dirty and guilty.

Yeah that's just a copypasta I got, I didn't actually write that.
That said, I'll respond to your points individually in a bit