Author Topic: Anita is at it again  (Read 4259 times)

The people who want her silenced are the ones keeping her afloat.

The thing is, she will always get attention. No matter what. SJWs and the media will always prop her up.

"...There's a lot of hate going towards me..."

If you didn't crash your reputation that hard then you wouldn't have that hate.
Why do people even support her???
Wow, In the part where Watch_Dogs was mentioned, they were showing a clip of how it's a bad thing to save women, what the forget? To top it off the point of the game is to save people, and not be too late.

She also claimed that in hitman, the point of the game is to target women for mindless violence.

It doesn't matter what the game is about, so long as she can cry patriarchy, the cash dough rolls in hand over fist

People want to be a victim of something, so they lap up all of anita's shenanigans

The thing is, she will always get attention. No matter what. SJWs and the media will always prop her up.
Gee, I wonder who caused that to happen.

It wasn't SJW's or the media that rose her up to the place she's in now. It was the people who thought her opinion was dumb and that she was dumb. People like you are the reason Anita has any ground in the world now. If she was left alone, she would probably be a nobody to this day.


i can't stop messing up the topic title with Amita from Far Cry 4.

guess i'm siding with Sabal :cookieMonster:

To those claiming that how her capitalizing off of this event is wrong, shouldn't we realize that A) this is a social reform issue, and that her methods for gaining support are hardly different from any other social reform issue.  The progressives of the early 20th century did nothing but this for decades, and I'm sure people complained, but what change they brought was a new meaning of freedom in America that lasts to thus day.  Compared to some issues, this seems a more moderate cause than some of the other issues today.  And B) If we should not criticize how she earns it, we should better criticize how she spends it.  If all the money for this is going to social reform programs, then she is not in the least bit corrupt about it.  However, if the money goes towards an expensive haircut or something, I am hesitant to say that she is the right voice to represent this issue.

wow, we really need more people like you in this world

no seriously, this is a great example of how we should be viewing this problem

Soon enough women will be like the children in the games. Unkillable and all lovable.

if tards hadn't of trolled her in the first place none of this would of happened.
i can't believe there's still people giving her ammunition
« Last Edit: January 17, 2015, 11:29:03 AM by Nomel »




im in love with how much nobody likes anita sarkeesian

if tards hadn't of trolled her in the first place none of this would of happened.
i can't believe there's still people giving her ammunition
The main issue isn't about her personally receiving death/rape threats.  The issue goes back further—gamers are upset that she accuses some video game developers for developing games that have loveist slurs, and for loveism within online gaming.  Both of these accusations have evidence both in GTA, and in the clip of Counterstrike that is presented.  In the former, the fact that the game allows this simply backs this up.  In the latter, this is seen commonly on online games—mind you, this is something that in any other medium is easily considered loveual harassment, and could stand effective in a court case.

The fuel for this issue was not solely personal threats on one individual, and it has pre-dated this issue.  Activists are using—and they commonly use—years of buildup to springboard their case.

thats completely ok as long as he's not a woman, right??
Society in a nutshell

i never understood why the "u are given the option to kill women in gta v!!!" argument is valid
you literally have to torture an innocent man to finish the game and thats not even an option but thats completely ok as long as he's not a woman, right??
this

The main issue isn't about her personally receiving death/rape threats.  The issue goes back further—gamers are upset that she accuses some video game developers for developing games that have loveist slurs, and for loveism within online gaming.  Both of these accusations have evidence both in GTA, and in the clip of Counterstrike that is presented.  In the former, the fact that the game allows this simply backs this up.  In the latter, this is seen commonly on online games—mind you, this is something that in any other medium is easily considered loveual harassment, and could stand effective in a court case.

The fuel for this issue was not solely personal threats on one individual, and it has pre-dated this issue.  Activists are using—and they commonly use—years of buildup to springboard their case.

The very basis of her argument is total bullstuff. She claims the fact that you can murder and run over prostitutes in GTAV loveism against women, but she completely disregards the fact that you can murder and run over ANYONE. Male or female.

She uses another example, Watch Dogs, and says women are murdered to give the player a reason to stop the criminal. She even tries to say this "reinforces the idea of women as loveual objects." loving what? Does she mention that men are also murdered in the same way? Of course not.

She has even claimed in the past that in Hitman Absolution, and this is an exact quote: "Players are meant to derive a perverse pleasure from desecrating the bodies of unsuspecting virtual female characters. It's a rush streaming from a carefully concocted mix of loveual arousal, connected to the act of controlling and punishing representations of female loveuality." I can't even handle how much absolute bullstuff this is. She is trying to claim that the game was designed for this sort of thing, when in reality, you're PENALIZED for killing civilians. You spend the entire game murdering men, but she focuses on one video of her dragging around a female corpse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuRSaLZidWI#t=150

She uses ridiculous made up examples of misogyny in video games to reach a completely reasonable goal. Everyone should get equality, but unfairly stuffting on the games industry is not how to do it.

"Justice attained through lies is not justice. We achieve true progress through rationality and treating each other like human beings." https://twitter.com/Totalbiscuit/status/555890518316445697
« Last Edit: January 18, 2015, 04:58:59 AM by dkamm65 »