Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 435402 times)

That probably wouldn't work. That would be considered descrimination to the people who smoke marijuana, since tobacco smokers can smoke in the open.

tobak also doesn't negatively impact any sort of motor skill or mental capacity at the time of smoking
which Toby undoubtedly does
its really not comparable to tobak at all
 

Quote
from: #Ravencroft on Yesterday at 11:41:35 PM
Alcohol and cigarettes are both 1000 times worse.

The only reason those are legal is because they've been so deeply integrated into our culture for ages. There's no getting rid of them. The last thing we need is another one.

Mind linking me to some of these "hundreds of thousands" of articles?
Plus, I don't really think you're "developing".


not sure if raven said that and edited it out or col but I've got to say that's one of the strangest things I've heard in a while seeing as how Toby was a commonplace at the birth of our country hell some of the founding fathers grew the stuff and was only made illegal in recent history if that's not deeply ingrained I don't know what is

i guess the completely well-developed and well-informed way that i rationalise it (not a very important issue to me personally) is that alcohol is legal?? like it can't possibly hurt anyone but you if you drink or smoke mary jane alone (obv you get into the whole area of "it affects people around you!!" but the effect there is more so dependency), but there are restrictions on public use or use in any case where you could cause some degree of harm to other people

ultimately i guess i'm OK as long as there are rules as you would expect to make sure other people are safer (stuff like DUI/DWI laws, bartender limits per customer, etc.)

but again i don't feel too strongly about the issue and haven't researched it. p much just w/e man idc lol


ok that's fair i ges...

It's not fair to sell poison and not sell medicine if people are going to use it the same way.


still waiting on those refutations

EDIT: Sorry, Nonnel. Meant from Raven.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2015, 08:11:50 PM by Col. Derontchi »



still waiting on those refutations

EDIT: Sorry, Nonnel. Meant from Raven.
im still waiting on your "refutations" boss.

im still waiting on your "refutations" boss.
You said there are "hundreds of thousands of articles" that countered the articles I provided. I asked for some of these "hundreds of thousands".

You said there are "hundreds of thousands of articles" that countered the articles I provided. I asked for some of these "hundreds of thousands".
don't be so lazy, look them up yourself

don't be so lazy, look them up yourself
"you're wrong and you must find the evidence to disprove yourself! I already know I'm right so I don't need someone else to say it!"


"you're wrong and you must find the evidence to disprove yourself! I already know I'm right so I don't need someone else to say it!"

you pretty much flat out ignored all the articles and citation people posted in the other threads, so what's the point in doing it all over again?