| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™® |
| << < (783/1316) > >> |
| Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Darryl McKoy on October 11, 2015, 05:20:27 AM ---So you don't think government officials should represent the morals of the majority of their constituents? --- End quote --- Not necessarily. The government should not have a position on morals which are largely up for debate, especially if it causes the minority to lose their personal rights. --- Quote from: Foxscotch on October 11, 2015, 10:48:15 AM ---a lot of your opinions seem to rely on you not knowing how real things work --- End quote --- I'll ask again, what law do you find necessary that is not stopping one party from harming another? |
| sir dooble:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on October 11, 2015, 01:25:35 PM ---I'll ask again, what law do you find necessary that is not stopping one party from harming another? --- End quote --- Under what scope are you using the word 'harm'? Because laws regarding libel, theft, motor insurance and property damage are necessary, but those actions don't physically harm a person. |
| Freedom Bringer:
nO. If you do dat ima whoop yo ass |
| Nonnel:
--- Quote from: sir dooble on October 11, 2015, 01:47:07 PM ---Under what scope are you using the word 'harm'? Because laws regarding libel, theft, motor insurance and property damage are necessary, but those actions don't physically harm a person. --- End quote --- anything that negatively affects someone in any way but emotionally this includes both physical and financial harm |
| sir dooble:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on October 11, 2015, 02:17:12 PM ---anything that negatively affects someone in any way but emotionally this includes both physical and financial harm --- End quote --- So then those whose speech compels others to physically harm themselves or others? Should laws not cover that? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |