Off Topic > Off Topic
Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®
Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Darryl McKoy on October 11, 2015, 05:20:27 AM ---So you don't think government officials should represent the morals of the majority of their constituents?
--- End quote ---
Not necessarily. The government should not have a position on morals which are largely up for debate, especially if it causes the minority to lose their personal rights.
--- Quote from: Foxscotch on October 11, 2015, 10:48:15 AM ---a lot of your opinions seem to rely on you not knowing how real things work
--- End quote ---
I'll ask again, what law do you find necessary that is not stopping one party from harming another?
sir dooble:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on October 11, 2015, 01:25:35 PM ---I'll ask again, what law do you find necessary that is not stopping one party from harming another?
--- End quote ---
Under what scope are you using the word 'harm'?
Because laws regarding libel, theft, motor insurance and property damage are necessary, but those actions don't physically harm a person.
Freedom Bringer:
nO. If you do dat ima whoop yo ass
Nonnel:
--- Quote from: sir dooble on October 11, 2015, 01:47:07 PM ---Under what scope are you using the word 'harm'?
Because laws regarding libel, theft, motor insurance and property damage are necessary, but those actions don't physically harm a person.
--- End quote ---
anything that negatively affects someone in any way but emotionally
this includes both physical and financial harm
sir dooble:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on October 11, 2015, 02:17:12 PM ---anything that negatively affects someone in any way but emotionally
this includes both physical and financial harm
--- End quote ---
So then those whose speech compels others to physically harm themselves or others? Should laws not cover that?