Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 440448 times)


In theory it definitely possibly could work, but realistically the chances of it working are pretty slim.

Dilemma
Dilemna
pretty sure it's dilemma but i certainly remember reading Dilemna in a video game before

I've provided evidence, That I have found, but instead of proper counter evidence to disprove my evidence, I get laugh posts and 'its not possible because, I think it's not possible."

The Evidence is there, until proven otherwise, I have no choice but to believe it to be true.
I hope you're trolling because thinking that a bunch of people mis-remembering random stuff is proof of parallel universes or whatever bullcrap is absolutely insane

pretty sure it's dilemma but i certainly remember reading Dilemna in a video game before
it could be the dalai lama

I hope you're trolling because thinking that a bunch of people mis-remembering random stuff is proof of parallel universes or whatever bullcrap is absolutely insane

Did you even watch the video evidence?

The Audio quote matches the memories, and not the history.

Its not the "claims" that are the evidence, its the evidence itself.

But incase you missed it.

You can't loving miss it this time.

Dilemma
Dilemna
i've never heard of "dilemna" in my life it's not even said like that and that doesn't make any phonetic or etymological sense hwat

I've provided evidence, That I have found, but instead of proper counter evidence to disprove my evidence, I get laugh posts and 'its not possible because, I think it's not possible."

The Evidence is there, until proven otherwise, I have no choice but to believe it to be true.
ignoring how much i'm laughing right now why do you feel the need to capitalize random words

You can't loving miss it this time.
Great, so now a loving christmas ornament having an incorrect quote on it is proof of parallel universes. Mind telling me how a third party company editing an audio clip to remove a word in order it to make it sell better being proof of parallel universes is any less insane?

Great, so now a loving christmas ornament having an incorrect quote on it is proof of parallel universes. Mind telling me how a third party company editing an audio clip to remove a word in order it to make it sell better being proof of parallel universes is any less insane?
Evidence?

Great, so now a loving christmas ornament having an incorrect quote on it is proof of parallel universes. Mind telling me how a third party company editing an audio clip to remove a word in order it to make it sell better being proof of parallel universes is any less insane?
but man you forget that george lucas' inspiration for star wars was his personal time traveling machine

It's actually true. According to schrondingers cat, you can make multiple universes and people can have their memories altered with quantum relativity

schrodinger's cat itself is still alive today, being the primary source of this key information


Evidence?
Where's your evidence that it hasn't been edited? Burden of proof rests on you here. It would be completely reasonable, and in fact would make perfect sense, for them to edit it to say that. Having a random "No" at the start of the sentence doesn't sound nice, having it just say "I am your father" is too short and doesn't tell to whom it's referring, so "Luke, I am your father" makes the most sense for them to make a more memorable christmas ornament. But even if you did prove that it's unedited that still wouldn't prove that there are parallel universes, all it would "prove" is that the movie studio forgeted up and gave them the wrong audio file.