Off Topic > Off Topic
Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®
Master Matthew²:
--- Quote from: otto-san on January 12, 2017, 10:53:06 PM ---Source?
--- End quote ---
are you asking for my source...
on asking for evidence?
What
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on January 12, 2017, 10:54:31 PM ---Where's your evidence that it hasn't been edited? Burden of proof rests on you here. It would be completely reasonable, and in fact would make perfect sense, for them to edit it to say that. Having a random "No" at the start of the sentence doesn't sound nice, having it just say "I am your father" is too short and doesn't tell to whom it's referring, so "Luke, I am your father" makes the most sense for them to make a more memorable christmas ornament.
--- End quote ---
First where is your evidence it has been edited?
The claim requires evidence, or evidence based suspicion at least.
So no, the burden of proof doesn't rest of me here, as you are the one making the claim it is fake.
And on top of that, even if they did edit the line in, where and how the hell did they get the actor to do the line par for par exact, but with one word change for a fan toy?
But because you've taken it this far, the reasoning is simple
Because every video review on this ornament has the same voice.
https://youtu.be/mIRZi2TP6_I?t=6m29s
Post Ninja Edit Quote:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on January 12, 2017, 10:54:31 PM ---But even if you did prove that it's unedited that still wouldn't prove that there are parallel universes, all it would "prove" is that the movie studio forgeted up and gave them the wrong audio file.
--- End quote ---
Again.
And on top of that, even if they did edit the line in, where and how the hell did they get the actor to do the line par for par exact, but with a single word changed?
beachbum111111:
--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on January 12, 2017, 10:59:16 PM ---are you asking for my source...
on asking for evidence?
WhatFirst where is your evidence it has been edited?
The claim requires evidence, or evidence based suspicion at least.
So no, the burden of proof doesn't rest of me here, as you are the one making the claim it is fake.
And on top of that, even if they did edit the line in, where and how the hell did they get the actor to do the line par for par exact, but with one word change for a fan toy?
But because you've taken it this far, the reasoning is simple
Because every video review on this ornament has the same voice.
https://youtu.be/mIRZi2TP6_I?t=6m29s
--- End quote ---
The burden of proof lies on you
IkeTheGeneric:
I wish I lived in the universe where master matthew never made an account sometimes
Master Matthew²:
--- Quote from: beachbum111111 on January 12, 2017, 11:00:52 PM ---The burden of proof lies on you
--- End quote ---
I made the base claim, gave the base evidence.
Claiming the evidence is false, requires further evidence.
Giving "what if possiblities" may be interesting, but things don't add up with these reasonings keeping the audio evidence in play.
Even if this is edited, how is it literally the exact audio clip as the original, with a different word?
Why does it exist?
Why isn't it in the movie?
Why would this line exist for a single toy?
How did it get there?
The Resonte!:
--- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on January 12, 2017, 11:03:23 PM ---I wish I lived in the universe where master matthew never made an account sometimes
--- End quote ---
if you sell your soul to me i can arrange that