Author Topic: Lockheed Martin Claims Sustainable Fusion Is Within Its Grasp  (Read 5581 times)

Aside from the whole missile thing as well, there isn't a huge need for super high altitude jets when you can throw a UAV into the air like a model plane.

Aside from the whole missile thing as well, there isn't a huge need for super high altitude jets when you can throw a UAV into the air like a model plane.
That is tactical UAV with the range of like 100km at most. Things like the SR-71, RQ-180, and SR-72 were designed as strategic reconnaissance planes with ranges upwards of 2,200km and could penetrate heavily defended airspace.

>plasma
yeah make something that gives users 3rd degree burns
wat

Cant wait for oil companies to stop this whole project with market tactics, and various illegal stuff!

Aside from the whole missile thing as well, there isn't a huge need for super high altitude jets when you can throw a UAV into the air like a model plane.
Well the spy satellite replaced the UAV for high altitude strategic recon. UAVs are good for small scale reconnaissance. The Military still relies on scout teams and reconnaissance vehicles like any other army.

Cant wait for oil companies to stop this whole project with market tactics, and various illegal stuff!
probably not gonna happen this way either.

Why did a picture of a C-130 come to my mind when I read the title?

i'm still bankin on lewinsky machines

It's very possible, it's just none of the people qualified to make these have either the money or the time to make them

Well the spy satellite replaced the UAV for high altitude strategic recon. UAVs are good for small scale reconnaissance. The Military still relies on scout teams and reconnaissance vehicles like any other army.
Satellites can't replace reconnaissance planes altogether. Satellites are predictable and allow the enemy time to hide what they don't want you to see, or move before you can strike. Which is one reason why Lockheed Martin is developing the Mach 6 SR-72 tethered with the High Speed Strike Missile (Hypersonic), so they can do recon before they can be hidden or even strike before they can do anything about it.

Oh and Satellites are no longer the untouchable silver bullet it used to be, dedicated satellite weapons now exist (US: Standard Missile-3 Russia: S-500 China: SC-19) which have all shown their ability to target satellites and destroy them effectively.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 09:08:22 AM by Clear Glass »

It's very possible, it's just none of the people qualified to make these have either the money or the time to make them
THAT'S IT
SOMEONE MAKE A KICKSTARTER
YOU'D GET SO MUCH CASH

Satellites can't replace reconnaissance planes altogether. Satellites are predictable and allow the enemy time to hide what they don't want you to see, or move before you can strike. Which is one reason why Lockheed Martin is developing the Mach 6 SR-72 tethered with the High Speed Strike Missile (Hypersonic), so they can do recon before they can be hidden or even strike before they can do anything about it.

Oh and Satellites are no longer the untouchable silver bullet it used to be, dedicated satellite weapons now exist (US: Standard Missile-3 Russia: S-500 China: SC-19) which have all shown their ability to target satellites and destroy them effectively.
We have enough space junk as it is in orbit. I doubt they are going to fire an anti-satellite missile unless they are that desperate.

We still have reconnaissance teams like FIST and Cav scouts and drones if you are going against a low tech enemy. The SR-71s were mainly used to fly over the USSR and look for things of great value like missile silos, weapon test sites, airfields, bases. Things you wanted to destroy as soon as possible. Stuff that and possibly SAM sites and short ranged ballistic missiles would be assigned to a satellite.

If you want to go find a tank platoon or weapons cache in a barn then is a job for a drone or reconnaissance team.

Sure the SR-72 might be a drone, but is a big target for big missiles. Besides anyone can just make a better radar with a faster missile.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 11:58:10 AM by Harm94 »

We have enough space junk as it is in orbit. I doubt they are going to fire an anti-satellite missile unless they are that desperate.
Unless they were desperate? If we had any sort of conflict with Russia or China the first thing they would want to do is totally wipe out our space assets. The US military is so heavily dependent on satellites for reconnaissance , GPS, etc it would cripple core services of the US.

We still have reconnaissance teams like FIST and Cav scouts and drones if you are going against a low tech enemy. The SR-71s were mainly used to fly over the USSR and look for things of great value like missile silos, weapon test sites, airfields, bases. Things you wanted to destroy as soon as possible. Stuff that and possibly SAM sites and short ranged ballistic missiles would be assigned to a satellite.
Okay so you are telling me that we should send in a ground based scout to look for mobile ICBM's and other high value targets inside Russia or China? I don't think so, that's what the SR-72 was designed to do.
If you want to go find a tank platoon or weapons cache in a barn then is a job for a drone or reconnaissance team.

Sure the SR-72 might be a drone, but is a big target for big missiles. Besides anyone can just make a better radar with a faster missile.
You are totally confusing tactical reconnaissance with strategic, which are two totally separate things.

The SR-72 travels at Mach 6 well above 120,000ft, which in theory would be in the combat envelope of the S-400. But a target flying at Mach 6 greatly reduces engagement time and the altitude also plays a factor. You also have to remember this thing would probably have a forget-load of ECM and active counter measures to ensure it's survival.

I just wish Lockheed would revive the SR-71 Blackbird. The plane didn't need any missile defense systems - it loving outran the missiles.
That it did but from what I was told it leaked fuel badly


Use duct tape.
Yep, Just patch it up using duct tape, not like this thing is flying 25,900 m in the  sky while going Mach 3