Nonnel's Nation RP: Earth 2077 - [AMERICA, THE BEAUTIFUL!]

Off Topic > Forum Games

<< < (536/1572) > >>

Zoltan:
nonnel have you actually looked at any of my pms
just to make sure

TristanLuigi:

--- Quote from: Operator¹ on April 22, 2015, 07:13:16 PM ---LYNX threatens to blow up a Swedish-built nuclear reactor that they captured near the town of Sneek if CTITF forces enter the Friesland,

--- End quote ---
dear lord perhaps we should send UNSC to help defuse the situation
Swat has proposed and I have supported the following treaty:

--- Quote from: Swat 3 on April 22, 2015, 07:01:17 PM ---I would like to request that a WWIII will possibly be mitigated for policies to be brought by both NATO and ESTO:

They are declared as DEFENSE treaties; an agitator and clear first-move member of either party against the opposite party are to not have any support against the mass-call-for-arms of the opposite alliance.

Peace is to be sought out immediately if stuff stirs up, under the guidance of the UNSC.

--- End quote ---

Basically, if a member of Alliance 1 attacks a member of Alliance 2:
- Alliance 1 is discouraged forbidden from helping their attacking member
- Alliance 2 is permitted to attack the infringing member without fear of penalty

This treaty - as I understand it - does not cover cases involving members of an alliance annexing other members of the same alliance. Swat, correct me if I have misunderstood any of this.

Doughboy:
when did sweden build a nuclear reactor in sneek

Operator¹:

--- Quote from: Doughboy on April 22, 2015, 07:20:51 PM ---when did sweden build a nuclear reactor in sneek

--- End quote ---

since when i was doing reconstruction there

Swat 3:
it isn't a "discouragement"

is basically says that alliance 1 is not called to arms, and doing so will be viewed as an attempt to disturb world peace

these are defense treaties for a reason

but yes, if a uh, member of the same alliance attacks another member they should get booted and raped.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version