Author Topic: Chewer- Anti-Blockhead RP + Keysharing to 3 people  (Read 3011 times)

this was a richard move, chewer obviously has some kind of problem, along with sugar. i don't see why people can't let them have fun.

forget off Setro. Let this kid have some fun with his siblings/friends, it's not like he's multiclienting 20 accounts. We all know you're doing this for attention.

and another wondrous drama for the day

To add, it appears that he either posted the key publicly to anyone online, or is just sharing it with a long-distance friend, since the approximate locations of the IP addresses are far away from each other.
Emphasis on approximate, however.

Key sharing and playing at the ame time from different locations does not work. All these clients are using the same public IP, otherwise they would be kicked with an authentication failed error after about 5 minutes.

this was a richard move, chewer obviously has some kind of problem, along with sugar. i don't see why people can't let them have fun.
forget off Setro. Let this kid have some fun with his siblings/friends, it's not like he's multiclienting 20 accounts. We all know you're doing this for attention.

but still, he hates IDs. but i see you got a point

/nosupport

but still, he hates IDs. but i see you got a point

/nosupport
Where's your proof.


/support
anti-blockhead AND he multicliented to make it seem like he has a good server people like.

/support
anti-blockhead AND he multicliented to make it seem like he has a good server people like.
join the server, there is no rule to no blockheads, and he doesnt multiclient, it is just his siblings/friends. also, he has 4 other people on the server a lot.

From my server logs, I have record of the same BL_ID connecting under IP address 71.244.32.237.
This does not match the IP the server is being hosted on, 96.266.266.20, and the server is not dedicated, therefore there is keysharing going on.

People's IP addresses can and do change.

Also, I've asked him. He says yes the extra chewers are his siblings.

Tl;dr:
Setro wants to see some revoke action and tries to make it look like chewer is key sharing, possibly without even asking chewer if he was multiclienting or not.

Case closed.

Fyi, if they were actually key-sharing and not just having a LAN party it would have caused authentication failures.

join the server, there is no rule to no blockheads
have you ever bothered to look at the server title

have you ever bothered to look at the server title
pretty sure most people in thread didn't
OT: i dont agree with revoking him part but the server title is kinda dumb