lemme just dissect this real quick:
This thread is making my day. For starters, rape means loveual activity without the aproval of both parties which is clearly not the case.
the case is: you came on your dog and allegedly had love with your dog
the argument is: it wasn't rape
therefore your claim is: it was consensual between you and your dog.
Secondly, there is no photographic nor viral evidence.
seems a little thin since you first began by stating what you did and your first point was that it wasn't rape, i don't think we need much evidence here cus you turned yourself in
Thirdly, I did not ask TRG if he wanted to see a real life canine rooster.
ironically this is the least offensive thing out of that list cus i see my dogs richard every day (he's naked)
this reminds me a of a joke where a serial killer is being tried and the judge reads off the crimes "you killed 7 people, ate their entrails, defecated on their belongings and then watched TV", to which the convict yells "that's absurd! i hate television!"
Thirdly, Argentina's penal code has nothing written regarding beastiality.
wonder why you'd point this out
verdict: this brother forgeted his dog
