It's better than stupid graffiti that we call "art".
yeah but as you can see in the second picture the richards are still there after they're fixed
well without the richard they probably wouldn't have gotten fixed that quickly in the first place.
I would rather see something abstract than a snake.
Most graffiti is far better art than what you'll see in a museum.
how exactly does this force the city to fix them
in theory, everyone sees the richard and they're like "haha wow that's a richard, but also there's a pothole so im gonna go tell someone to fix both of those things"
so... why couldn't the person who was drawing the richards just tell someone to fix it himself? instead of drawing bs on the road and expecting someone else to do it for him?
do you honestly thing a city would take action if only a few people were saying "yeah there's a pothole here i guess" every once in a while?
uh yeah, they do it all the time where I live