Can the "No Ban Evasion" rule please be re-enforced?

[Lego lad]

well uh

that's how brown townogies work

if you want i can deconstruct it further so you're not distracted by the comparison

rekt

[Ad Bot]

[Maxxi]

I wonder how much posts will it take maxx from now on to damage control

none because that's never going to happen

[Kochieboy]

Couldn't have put it any better jubel, it's been mentioned time after time again, but not this well. The only part is trying to find a proper way to prevent the problem users from circumventing any IP name or ban-on-sight measures.

[Cybertails1998]

none because that's never going to happen

literally one post in.  gg

also seriously why isn't a ban on sight system in place

[SgtDaemon]

also seriously why isn't a ban on sight system in place

there is

afaik anyone badspot banned under the 'do not come back' purge is revoked as soon as they are found out about

but those people were outright malicious, people who are plain handicapped at times like max but don't actually/regularly break any rules aren't really bad enough to get autopurged

[Paperclip²]

i like this idea.

[Path]

All revokes due to any form of hacking/disassembly of the game files are per license. These cannot be undone in any way, and require a new license to be purchased in order to continue use of the product.

Code: [Select]

YOU MAY NOT: modify, translate, disassemble, reverse engineer, or decompile the Software.  Any derivative works become property of Blockland LLC.

Code: [Select]

5. Term.

The term of this license grant is perpetual. You may terminate this Agreement at any time by destroying all copies of the Software in your possession. Your license to use the Software will automatically terminate if you breach the terms of this Agreement.
As all mods/add-ons developed for blockland and released on the forum are considered property of Blockland, any code that violates any set or automatically understood rules defined by Badspot can be deemed dangerous and any owners or contributors of said code may have their license terminated with no advance notice.

So, with that said, any bans or revokes for the reason of owning, redistributing, contributing or submitting flagged code of any sort are justified by the terms and conditions PER LICENSE. Any bans on further purchased licenses after the time of the first termination that are NOT justified by the terms and conditions could be used as defense against the termination.

This is the basic explanation for revokes on Blockland. These are set guidelines and consequences that cannot be evaded at all and are inclusive only to the extent of the terms and conditions.


Any bans on the forum, however, are fair game, as the forum doesn't really have any set terms and conditions. Since forum accounts are now connected to purchased licenses, it can be assumed that all bans are per license as well. In simpler terms, as long as the aggressor has a lot of money, they can keep on buying as many loving keys as they want. No action or termination will ensue until these rules are again violated on the new license.

[Path]

Also, there's no such thing as handicaps, stuffposters, trollers, and idiots when dealing with legally guided transactions of currency.

[Path]

I've been revoked about 4-5 times, all for hacking and redistributing blhack.dll. Badspot knows my IP. he most likely knows who I am and what I've done, but cannot revoke me unless I actually violate these rules again on this purchased license.

[Ravencroft·]

I've been revoked about 4-5 times, all for hacking and redistributing blhack.dll. Badspot knows my IP. he most likely knows who I am and what I've done, but cannot revoke me unless I actually violate these rules again on this purchased license.

But what about people like betel and marbleman who get banned/revoked on sight.

[Akio]

But what about people like betel and marbleman who get banned/revoked on sight.

Does Iban get revoked on sight?

[Ravencroft·]

Does Iban get revoked on sight?

I think he does, he tried to come back like a year ago and got revoked pretty quickly if I recall correctly.

[Path]

It's likely that the 'ban on sight' is a misunderstanding of their revokes. They are probably still doing something illegal or are still in possession of a document that will result in their license being terminated. From what i've seen, most of them have been drama'd for doing something after they purchased a new key. If this is the case, it's not ban on sight; It's just them being stupid and immediately doing the same thing that got them banned in the first place.

[Path]

Another possibility is that the forum-to-license relationship is relatively new, and resulted in the EULA being modified to fit the forum as well. Modified user licenses are in effect as soon as they are set, and does not relate to or change any events that violate the previous version of the license.

Most of those flagged users were pricks and did stupid stuff before the modification of the license. Therefore, the fate of their licenses are determined by an old document that isn't even in effect anymore.

[Gytyyhgfffff]

Code: [Select]

YOU MAY NOT: modify, translate, disassemble, reverse engineer, or decompile the Software.  Any derivative works become property of Blockland LLC.

this part of the eula is really loving strange, honestly. we've had multiple people inject stuff into their blockland such as superload.dll and antidote.dll and they have not been revoked or been told that they have broken the eula. wouldn't this injection stuff be breaking term two or whatever?