Author Topic: Ban on possession of child research takes effect in Japan  (Read 5908 times)


Considering Pie Crust forgeted his dog, he has no room to talk.

I am not trying to defend pie crust, but there is a big difference between dogs and children.

Considerin it's just posession and not making it, I think it's fine.
If you finish it then you possess it

A year in prison or $8000 isn't very light
Yes it is lol

Compare it with the US:



Of course the US prison system is terrible so they shouldn't just straight up copy the US sentences. But 1 year is a bit light


Also see the use of the words "up to." That's the maximum sentence, meaning people can get less.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 10:40:31 AM by Headcrab Zombie »

I am not trying to defend pie crust, but there is a big difference between dogs and children.

Because pictures of little girls are worse than forcing your dog to have love with you.

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.


Because pictures of little girls are worse than forcing your dog to have love with you.

That's not what I said, I was just saying dogs and children aren't the same thing. Thus, saying pie crust is in the wrong in THIS CASE is wrong, I am FULLY AWARE he is in the wrong, just not in this case.

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.

you dug yourself deeper
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 11:31:41 AM by Blokx »

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.
What the actual forget am I reading.

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.
no
no what the forget

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.
are you trying to justify loving your dog

are you trying to justify loving your dog

no
no what the forget

What the actual forget am I reading.

That's not what I said, I was just saying dogs and children aren't the same thing. Thus, saying pie crust is in the wrong in THIS CASE is wrong, I am FULLY AWARE he is in the wrong, just not in this case.

you dug yourself deeper

guys you're falling into the same trap as a couple months ago

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.

No no no we've been through this guys. Remember the 120+ pages of drama? We solved nothing and we won't solve anything now.

Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.


Again. It was not forced. There are ways to get consent from a dog. Speech isn't the only form of consent that exists, you know.
Here, son, this is an example of "bait".