Silleb, City, Cool Blockhead - loveually Harassing Sugar and banning her

[Darryl McKoy]

I joined this server a while ago and Silleb was having an absolute aneurysm over people driving outside of the lines on the roads. He was literally spying people to make sure they were driving 'correctly'. I saw multiple people get banned as a result lol

[Ad Bot]

[·:Taboo:·]

wow, hey there handsome

[Akio]

I joined this server a while ago and Silleb was having an absolute aneurysm over people driving outside of the lines on the roads. He was literally spying people to make sure they were driving 'correctly'. I saw multiple people get banned as a result lol

are you Bolster or did you take his avatar

[·:Taboo:·]

no he's boltster

[XR-7]

Uh oh

[Khaz°]

One way or another, what City and Silleb were doing was wrong. You don't say stuff like that to anyone, or even say stuff like that at all. It's offensive. If they had kept their loving mouths shut, this thread wouldn't exist. Your argument is flawed, and I'm disappointed you would defend something like this. richard move, man. richard move.

/Support to this thread.

are you kidding me

he's not defending silleb and city's actions at all what thread are you even reading

[Maxx°]

i dont really mind sugar and this is a bit TOO forgeted up
also, even if she uses several lines of text to chat, it doesn't really matter
its just how she communicates

[Ze Operator]

are you kidding me

he's not defending silleb and city's actions at all what thread are you even reading

inb4disgraceful comment. And here's EXACTLY what I'm reading.

But they never implied anything loveual towards her. Of course it was some weird stuff he said but it had nothing to do with Sugar. City and Silleb were just being total richards to her.

Nice defense there, when you two are shutting your eyes toward how this stuff went down. THAT'S why everyone is losing their mind over this thread, and for a good reason!

[Checko2100]

Nice defense there, when you two are shutting your eyes toward how this stuff went down. THAT'S why everyone is losing their mind over this thread, and for a good reason!

Learn to read

He was not defending them, he was just showing up how it was not directed at Sugar but how they were being richards

[Khaz°]

inb4disgraceful comment. And here's EXACTLY what I'm reading.

Nice defense there, when you two are shutting your eyes toward how this stuff went down. THAT'S why everyone is losing their mind over this thread, and for a good reason!

im not shutting my eyes towards anything.

im probably one of the biggest sugar "white knights" out there. im just one of the (apparent) few who can actually acknowledge ravencroft's view on things. also that quote isn't defending silleb or city you denseskull. it's just simply him stating his view based on evidence given via chatlogs. stop being stupid you have no idea what you're talking about

[mod-man]

think of it as two dudes exchanging rape comments in a special needs classroom

even tho they really should leave the room or at the very least talk privately, they arent directing their comments at anyone but themselves. which begs the question, is that loveual harassment?

[PurpleSir]

stop trololling

[spideykong]

Do people beat off to bullying/harassing, or in this case bullying/harassing people with special needs?

/support

[Path]

stop bully sugar               yes or no

[ABlockOfCheese]

stop bully sugar               yes no

fixed